Trump's mar-a-largo as well as Trump towers has been seized all his assets are frozen ! you can' ctart any wars with anvady right now And his ICE
Executive summary
The claim that Mar-a-Lago and Trump Tower properties have been seized and "all his assets are frozen" is not supported by the reporting provided; the record in these sources documents an FBI search of Mar-a-Lago and mixed financial performance of Trump-linked assets, not a government-wide seizure or asset freeze [1] [2]. Similarly, the sources supplied do not address whether a private individual can "start wars" or whether Homeland Security/ICE actions have been curtailed, so those parts of the question cannot be confirmed or denied from this reporting [2] [3] [1].
1. What actually happened at Mar‑a‑Lago: an FBI search, not a government seizure
The publicly reported federal action involving Mar‑a‑Lago documented by these sources is the August 8, 2022 FBI search that recovered a large volume of government documents — reportedly over 13,000 documents with more than 300 classified items — as part of a federal classified‑documents investigation, a fact laid out in the case summary covered by the Wikipedia entry on the prosecution [1]. That reporting details subsequent litigation and investigatory steps tied to those documents, including references to people who handled boxes and internal Mar‑a‑Lago personnel, but it does not say the property was seized or that Trump's private business entities were placed under a blanket government freeze [1].
2. Financial reporting: growth for Trump overall, uneven performance for linked assets
Contemporary financial coverage described a net expansion of Trump’s wealth in 2025 while noting that some publicly traded assets tied to him or his family underperformed peers and broader markets, and that certain crypto tokens associated with his brand lost value relative to benchmarks — for example, an index comparison showed Official TRUMP tokens lagging dogecoin and the broader crypto market [2]. That kind of market performance reporting reflects investors’ returns and share/crypto price moves, not legal confiscation or sweeping asset freezes; the Axios summary frames the story as investment performance, not government seizure [2].
3. Images and optics at Mar‑a‑Lago during foreign‑policy events
Separate reporting spotlighted images from what was described as a Mar‑a‑Lago situation room during a Venezuelan strike, with observers noting the group appeared to be focused on social media feeds — an optics story about media consumption and messaging during a foreign‑policy moment, not a legal or financial action against properties [3]. That Daily Mail coverage is inherently visual and interpretive and reflects how media outlets amplify scenes for readers; it should be read as a snapshot of behavior and perception rather than documentary evidence of asset status [3].
4. Legal supports and political financing tied to Mar‑a‑Lago personnel
The federal case record covered in the prosecution summary indicates political organizations tied to Trump have at times intervened to help legal representation for Mar‑a‑Lago personnel and associates — for example, reporting notes that the Save America PAC paid legal fees for an IT director linked to the site — which underscores the entanglement of political, legal and private resources in high‑profile investigations [1]. That fact demonstrates how political funding can shape the practical defense posture around investigations but does not equate to official asset seizure.
5. What is not answered clearly by these sources: freezes, war‑powers, and ICE actions
The supplied sources do not document any federal government action that seized Mar‑a‑Lago or Trump Tower properties outright, nor do they show a comprehensive freezing of “all his assets,” so those claims remain unsubstantiated in this packet of reporting [2] [1]. Likewise, none of these items address constitutional war powers or whether an individual can “start any wars” — a constitutional and institutional question involving the president, Congress and the military chain of command that is outside the scope of the provided articles [2] [1]. Finally, the materials supplied do not cover any change to ICE operations or authority tied to these events, so no conclusion about "his ICE" can be drawn from this reporting [2] [3] [1].
6. Reading the signals: distinguish legal action from market noise and media spectacle
The most reliable conclusion from these pieces is a narrow one: federal investigators executed a search and recovered classified documents at Mar‑a‑Lago and contemporaneous financial reporting shows some Trump‑branded investments underperformed in 2025; beyond that, assertions of property seizure, a total asset freeze, unilateral war‑starting authority, or changes to ICE powers are not documented in the supplied sources and would require corroborating legal or official records to confirm [1] [2] [3]. Readers should treat sensationalized summaries or social‑media claims about "seizure" and "freezes" cautiously and seek direct statements from court filings, Treasury or Justice Department orders for confirmation.