Trump calling senators and ranting

Checked on February 1, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

Multiple outlets report that President Donald Trump placed “angry,” profanity-laced calls to Republican senators who backed advancing a war powers resolution limiting his actions on Venezuela, with Sen. Susan Collins repeatedly named as a recipient of an especially acrid call and threats of primary challenges reportedly conveyed [1] [2] [3].

1. What the reporting says happened

Hours after the Senate advanced a Democratic-led war powers resolution, Trump reportedly phoned each of the five Republicans who crossed the aisle, delivering angry, profanity-laced tirades and warning that their votes would have consequences, including threats of primary challenges, according to NBC News, The Hill and other outlets [1] [2] [4].

2. Who was singled out — the Collins call as the focal point

Most accounts single out Sen. Susan Collins (R‑Maine) as the chief target, describing a “profanity-laced” call in which Trump “read her the riot act,” with multiple publications relaying anonymous Senate GOP sources who characterized the exchange as a particularly heated rant [2] [3] [5].

3. What evidence supports these accounts

The narratives rely on reporting from Hill, NBC News and other outlets citing people “familiar” with the calls or anonymous Senate sources; media summaries and follow-ups appeared across mainstream and tabloid outlets alike, and the timing matches public votes and subsequent posts on Truth Social mentioning the senators who defected [1] [2] [6]. There are no public audio recordings of the calls reported in these pieces, and the accounts are sourced to officials and aides rather than direct transcripts [2] [3].

4. Political context and likely motives

Reporting situates the calls in a high-stakes moment: the resolution sought to constrain the president’s ability to use military force in Venezuela, and the five GOP defections occurred as Trump pushes an assertive foreign-policy posture while eyeing party discipline ahead of competitive 2026 contests — motives that align with threats of primaries and the pressure to maintain a unified GOP front [1] [2] [7].

5. Implications for Senate dynamics and governance

If accurate, such aggressive outreach underscores how the president is using personal pressure to enforce party conformity, potentially chilling dissent by vulnerable incumbents like Collins and shaping legislative calculations on oversight and war powers; several outlets note the electoral vulnerability of at least one target, which amplifies the political leverage of presidential rebuke [5] [6].

6. Alternative readings and reporting limits

Some accounts — including outlets that emphasize sensational language — may amplify tone; details come almost entirely from anonymous sources and secondary reporting rather than first‑hand recordings, so the precise words, volume and exact threats cannot be independently verified from the available reporting [3] [2]. Other reputable reporting documents a pattern of Trump phone calls to lawmakers generally (including conciliatory or unexpected calls to Democrats in other contexts), suggesting phone outreach is a common tool and not, by itself, dispositive of policy outcomes [8].

7. Bottom line

Contemporary reporting consistently portrays Trump as having made angry, profanity‑laden calls to GOP senators who backed the Venezuela-related war powers resolution and as having threatened political retribution such as primary challenges, but the accounts depend on anonymous sources and media summaries rather than public transcripts or audio; the substance of the calls — threats, profanity, and the intent to enforce party discipline — is corroborated across several outlets even as precise wording and full context remain unverifiable in the public record [1] [2] [4].

Want to dive deeper?
Which five Republican senators voted to advance the Venezuela war powers resolution and what reasons did they give?
How have past presidential calls to senators affected primary challenges and party discipline in recent U.S. history?
What legal authorities govern the president’s ability to use military force in Venezuela and how would the war powers resolution change that?