Trump calls for Obama arrest.

Checked on February 8, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

President Donald Trump used his Truth Social account to call for the arrest of former president Barack Obama, accusing him of treason and alleging a broad conspiracy that included foreign governments and U.S. agencies; those posts amplified unsubstantiated claims and prompted widespread backlash from media and some political figures [1] [2] [3]. Reporting shows the demand to “ARREST OBAMA NOW” was part of an overnight torrent of conspiratorial posts and followed other inflammatory content the president shared about the Obamas, but available sources do not document any legal action or prosecutorial move tied to those allegations [1] [4] [5].

1. The charge and the platform: how the call was made

The core act at the center of coverage is President Trump’s public call for Barack Obama to be arrested, delivered via posts on his Truth Social platform that accused Obama of “treason” and urged immediate detention with posts including the phrase “ARREST OBAMA NOW” [1] [3]. Reports across outlets—ranging from progressive outlets like Mother Jones to conservative outlets like The American Conservative and international wires—confirm the call was broadcast on social media rather than through legal filings or formal executive communications [2] [3].

2. The alleged crimes: coup, conspiracy and claims cited

Trump’s public posts tied the arrest demand to sweeping allegations that Obama orchestrated or colluded in efforts to undermine electoral outcomes, characterizing past events as a “coup” and naming a cast of actors—from foreign governments to U.S. intelligence and financial firms—as participants in his narrative that Obama “installed Biden as a puppet” [1] [6]. Reporting notes these assertions were linked to long-running, unsubstantiated conspiracy theories about the 2016 and 2020 elections rather than to new, verified evidence presented in a court or official investigation [2] [1].

3. Context and pattern: amplification of conspiracies and racist content

The arrest demand did not occur in isolation; it came amid a broader pattern of posts in which Trump amplified conspiracy claims about elections and shared deeply offensive content, including a since-deleted video that depicted Barack and Michelle Obama as apes—a clip the president later said he had directed aides to post and then claimed he had not seen in full [4] [7] [5]. News organizations frame the arrest call as part of an “overnight avalanche” of “weird and conspiratorial missives,” signaling escalation rather than a discrete legal argument [1].

4. Responses, credibility and the absence of legal follow-through

Media coverage documents swift condemnation from opponents and concern among some Republicans, while also showing that the substance of the claims has not been supported by the kind of evidentiary record that would typically undergird a criminal prosecution; outlets note the allegations remain unsubstantiated and that past responses from Obama’s team have refuted similar claims [2] [8] [1]. None of the provided sources reports that federal prosecutors or the Department of Justice filed charges against Obama or launched a public criminal case tied directly to Trump’s posts, and reporting instead treats the demand as political rhetoric amplified online [2] [3].

5. Stakes and motives: political theater, accountability claims, and media dynamics

Supporters who favor aggressive investigations of political opponents frame demands like “arrest Obama” as a call for accountability for perceived abuses, a position media outlets report that allies have echoed [3] [8]; critics argue the posts are dangerous demagoguery that weaponize law-enforcement language for political ends and escalate polarization while relying on false or unproven narratives [1] [4]. Coverage also highlights the implicit agenda of rallying a base online—using provocative claims and imagery—to shift public attention during competing domestic crises, but the sources do not provide internal White House evidence explaining strategy beyond public postings [1] [2].

Want to dive deeper?
What public statements or legal responses has Barack Obama’s office issued regarding Trump’s arrest claims?
What standards and evidentiary steps must U.S. prosecutors meet before charging a former president with crimes?
How have social media platforms and staffers been implicated in the spread of inflammatory political content from the White House?