Were there public statements or bills from Trump or his campaign advocating term-limit changes?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Donald Trump and his campaigns have repeatedly called for imposing term limits on members of Congress and have publicly pledged to push for a constitutional amendment to that effect, typically advocating three two-year terms for the House and two six‑year terms for the Senate (i.e., six years for representatives, 12 for senators) [1] [2] [3]. While Trump and his advisers made multiple public statements and campaign promises endorsing congressional term limits, the administration or campaign itself has not—because presidents and campaigns do not introduce constitutional amendments—been the sponsor of the specific joint resolutions introduced in Congress; those have been carried by members of Congress and allied groups [4] [5] [6].
1. Trump’s public statements and campaign promises in favor of congressional term limits
During his campaigns and in the wake of his presidency Trump explicitly promised to “push for a constitutional amendment” to impose term limits on Congress, repeating that plank from his Drain the Swamp messaging and laying out a concrete cap—three House terms (six years) and two Senate terms (12 years)—in multiple appearances and campaign materials [1] [2] [7]. C-SPAN archived an event in which Trump discussed proposing a constitutional amendment for congressional term limits, and campaign fact sheets and news reporting from his campaign trail reiterated the pledge as part of his National Greatness agenda and second‑term promises [4] [7] [8]. Independent outlets have summarized his recurring pledge to use the presidential platform to press for such an amendment rather than claiming the executive can unilaterally impose limits [8].
2. Legislative vehicles: who actually filed bills and what they say
Concrete legislative texts proposing term‑limit amendments have been introduced in Congress by lawmakers rather than by the president; for example, H.J.Res.12 in the 119th Congress would bar individuals after three House terms and two Senate terms—language matching the limits Trump advocated—if ratified by the states [5]. Other Republican lawmakers and allies have introduced similar constitutional amendment resolutions and coordinated with outside groups such as U.S. Term Limits to press an amendment route; several proposals in recent years consistently mirrored the 6‑year/12‑year framework Trump endorsed [6] [3]. GovTrack and Constitution Center reporting note a spate of such resolutions, but also that none have cleared the high thresholds required to amend the Constitution [3] [9].
3. Political context and critiques of the proposal
Supporters frame congressional term limits as anti‑establishment reform to reduce careerism in Washington, a central selling point for Trump’s Drain the Swamp message and for allied groups [10] [2]. Critics argue term limits would weaken institutional oversight and increase executive influence—an argument frequently raised in analyses warning that a less experienced Congress could cede power to presidents and lobbyists—which is a relevant counterpoint given that the president himself has promoted the change [3]. Constitutional scholars and commentators also stress the practical barrier: a constitutional amendment requires two‑thirds approval in both chambers and ratification by three‑quarters of the states, a high hurdle that proponents have historically failed to clear [9] [6].
4. Related but distinct proposals: presidential term rules and court tenure
While Trump has pushed congressional term limits, other, separate proposals in the 2024–2025 period sought opposite changes to presidential term rules or reforms to Supreme Court tenure: Rep. Andy Ogles introduced a resolution to amend the 22nd Amendment to allow a third presidential term for Trump and others, a move aimed at extending, not limiting, executive service [11] [12]. Meanwhile, some Democrats and lawmakers have separately floated 18‑year limits for Supreme Court justices, an initiative unconnected to Trump’s congressional‑term‑limit pledge but illustrative of a broader debate over term limits across institutions [13].
5. Bottom line: statements versus bills—what Trump directly did and what followed
In sum, Trump and his campaign repeatedly and publicly advocated for congressional term limits and pledged to push for a constitutional amendment implementing the 6‑year/12‑year framework; concrete amendment bills reflecting that framework were introduced by members of Congress and supported by allied organizations, but not “filed by Trump” himself, and those proposals face steep constitutional and political obstacles [1] [2] [5] [9] [6]. The record shows consistent public advocacy from Trump and tangible legislative activity from congressional allies, along with competing proposals that would extend presidential terms or limit judicial tenure—underscoring that term‑limits debates are fragmented and driven by multiple actors with different agendas [11] [13].