Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Have either Donald Trump or Bill Clinton publicly addressed rumors of sexual relations between them?
Executive summary
Available reporting shows Donald Trump has repeatedly publicly addressed and defended himself against sexual-misconduct stories and has used Bill Clinton’s past scandals as a political counterpunch (e.g., Trump denied affairs including with Stormy Daniels and paraded Clinton accusers; Trump also asked DOJ to probe Clinton-Epstein ties) [1] [2] [3]. Bill Clinton has long denied allegations of sexual assault and denied specific claims about ties to Jeffrey Epstein; his denials and prior testimony (including the Lewinsky matter) are documented in contemporaneous reporting and public records [4] [5].
1. Trump’s public responses: denials, deflection and staging accusers
Donald Trump has publicly denied a range of alleged affairs and sexual-misconduct accusations — for example, The Guardian reports Trump denied relationships with Stephanie Clifford (Stormy Daniels) and Karen McDougal and has denied misconduct alleged by multiple women [1]. He has at times framed such stories as partisan attacks and explicitly deflected attention to Bill Clinton, publicly presenting women who accused Clinton of misconduct at campaign events and using Clinton’s history as a foil to his own controversies [2] [6]. More recently, reporting shows Trump has sought to put focus back on Bill Clinton by requesting a Justice Department probe into Clinton’s ties with Jeffrey Epstein after release of related documents [3] [7].
2. Clinton’s public responses: denials, legal language and the Lewinsky testimony
Bill Clinton has repeatedly denied allegations of sexual assault and wrongdoing. Coverage of his misconduct allegations and their fallout notes formal denials through lawyers in several cases and shows the Lewinsky episode produced explicit denials (“I did not have sexual relations with that woman”) that later conflicted with testimony and evidence in legal proceedings [4] [8] [9]. On the Epstein matter, Clinton’s office issued statements saying he “knows nothing about” the crimes Epstein pleaded guilty to and that his flights on Epstein’s plane were related to foundation work, while Newsweek and Reuters reporting say Clinton flew on Epstein’s jet but deny evidence of involvement in trafficking [5] [3].
3. Where sources show overlap and where they diverge
Reporting establishes that both men have made public statements: Trump’s denials of his own alleged affairs and his public attacks on Clinton are explicit in multiple outlets [1] [2]. Clinton’s denials of assault allegations and his explanations about Epstein-related contacts are likewise documented [4] [5]. Sources diverge in emphasis: outlets like The Guardian and CNN foreground Trump’s many denials and explicit use of Clinton’s history as political ammunition [1] [10], while Newsweek and Reuters highlight Clinton’s statements distancing himself from Epstein’s crimes and noting air travel on Epstein’s plane without alleging trafficking involvement [5] [3].
4. Legal and rhetorical nuance: “sexual relations,” perjury and public messaging
The phrase “sexual relations” took on legal import in Clinton’s deposition and grand jury testimony; legal analysis explains how definitions mattered to whether Clinton’s denials were true under oath, and that failing to match a legal definition became the center of impeachment-related charges [8]. For Trump, public rebuttals have been less about legal terminologies and more about blanket denials, apologies for crude comments in some instances, and aggressive political counterattacks invoking Clinton-era scandals [11] [1].
5. The Epstein factor: public claims, denials, and political use
Jeffrey Epstein documents and emails brought both men back into overlapping narratives. Reporting says Epstein disputed some claims about Clinton and asserted he “never” took Clinton to his island while Trump publicly claimed he turned down an island visit [12] [5]. Recent reporting shows Trump publicly asking DOJ to investigate Clinton’s ties to Epstein — itself a public address that pushes allegations into the political and legal arena — while Reuters and other outlets note there is “no credible evidence” in the record that Clinton participated in trafficking [3] [7].
6. What the available sources do not say and limits of coverage
Available sources do not mention either man explicitly admitting to a sexual relationship with the other; there is no reporting in the provided set that asserts direct sexual relations between Donald Trump and Bill Clinton, nor do the sources present corroborated evidence of such a relationship. If you seek confirmation or refutation of that specific rumor, available sources do not mention it and do not provide direct evidence one way or the other (not found in current reporting).
7. Bottom line for readers
Both Trump and Clinton have publicly addressed sexual-misconduct allegations: Trump through denials, apologies for certain remarks, and by publicly raising Clinton’s past as a political strategy [11] [1] [2]; Clinton through denials, legal testimony with contested phrasing, and statements distancing himself from Epstein-related crimes while acknowledging some contacts [8] [5] [4]. None of the provided reporting documents either man admitting to sexual relations with the other; the debate in coverage focuses on denials, legal definitions, and political weaponization of allegations [8] [6].