Has Trump made similar comments about military service or veterans in other years (2015 2016 2019 2024)?

1. What claimants say happened — a catalog of the key allegations that matter to the question

The analyses extract a set of clear, recurring claims: that Trump allegedly called fallen American service members “losers” and “suckers,” insulted Senator John McCain and a gold star family, questioned the purpose of service while at gravesites, and engaged in episodic behavior seen as disrespectful toward the military across multiple years including 2016–2018 and beyond ^{[1] [3]}. At the same time, other records emphasize his public remarks honoring veterans at official events and credit him with veterans’ policy actions, suggesting a contrasting portrayal of him as a veterans-supporting president in venues like AMVETS and White House ceremonies in 2019 ^{[2] [4]}. These are the central, competing claims that the source set advances.

2. Where the evidence lines up: documented incidents suggesting a pattern of disparagement

A cluster of analyses compiles specific, repeated allegations from 2016–2018 that point to a pattern: reports that Trump mocked John McCain’s service, offended a gold star family, used demeaning language about war dead during a canceled cemetery visit, and asked what soldiers “got” for their sacrifices while standing at a grave — episodes presented as documented public controversies that feed the narrative of disrespect ^{[1] [3]}. These sources argue the incidents, taken together, create a consistent behavioral pattern and cite contemporaneous reporting and testimony that formed the basis for those allegations ^{[1] [3]}. The analyses treat those episodes as substantive, recurring claims across years.

3. Where the evidence diverges: official remarks and policy outreach that portray support for veterans

Other analyses show a different thread in the record, emphasizing formal remarks and policy steps taken by Trump that explicitly acknowledge and support veterans, particularly in 2019. The White House-published speeches from 2019 at the New York City Veterans Day Parade, AMVETS convention, and Wounded Warrior Project events are highlighted as instances where he publicly praised veterans and described administration efforts like Veterans Choice and VA-related reforms ^{[2] [4] [5]}. These sources argue that public-facing ceremonies and policy claims counter the narrative that Trump uniformly disrespected the military, and they treat the administration’s legislative and executive actions as evidence of substantive support.

4. Reconciling the competing records: a mixed but traceable timeline across years

When the analyses are compared chronologically, a nuanced picture emerges: the allegations of derogatory private remarks and cancelled visits cluster in the mid-to-late 2010s and are framed as a pattern of disrespectful episodes ^{[1] [3]}, while the administration’s public events and policy pronouncements in 2019 and other years show repeated rhetorical and institutional outreach to veterans ^{[2] [4]}. The datasets do not provide indisputable proof that every allegation occurred exactly as reported, nor do they resolve motive, but they demonstrate coexistence of damaging allegations and public-facing actions across the same timeframe, complicating any simple characterization.

5. Why sources disagree and what each might be emphasizing or omitting

The sources differ in focus and apparent agenda: some prioritize journalistic allegations and anecdotal accounts that underscore personal disrespect and controversial private comments ^{[1] [3]}, while official White House materials and supportive analyses emphasize formal speeches and policy achievements for veterans ^{[2] [4]}. Each side omits or downplays the other’s strongest evidence: allegations critics cite are often absent from administration-published texts, and policy and public-remarks records do not address private conduct claims. This divergence makes the overall record both contested and incomplete, requiring readers to weigh corroboration and motive.

6. Bottom line — what the assembled analyses allow you to say with confidence

The assembled analyses show that Trump has been associated with both alleged derogatory comments about military service and with repeated public expressions and policy claims in support of veterans across the years asked about. The record is not uniform: allegations of disrespect are concentrated in several high-profile incidents mid-decade, while documented public remarks and policy efforts are prominent in 2019 and cited in later summaries as evidence of outreach. Any definitive judgment requires weighing contemporaneous reporting, primary documents, and corroboration beyond the summarized analyses provided here ^{[1] [2] [3]}.