Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Were there other instances of Trump commenting on physical disabilities?
Executive summary
Donald Trump has been repeatedly accused in reporting and advocacy commentary of mocking people with disabilities — most notably his 2015 imitation of New York Times reporter Serge Kovaleski, which multiple outlets documented and which provoked sustained backlash [1] [2] [3]. Additional instances cited in opinion and advocacy pieces include his use of terms like “mentally disabled” about political rivals and reported impressions of President Biden’s stutter; coverage and responses vary across news, advocacy, and fact-check outlets [4] [5] [6].
1. The high‑profile 2015 Kovaleski episode: what happened and how the press covered it
At a South Carolina rally in November 2015, Trump recited a passage about a reporter “going like, I don’t remember” while adopting an odd voice and flailing his arms; mainstream outlets including BBC, PBS and People reported that many viewers saw the gesture as mocking Serge Kovaleski, who has a congenital joint condition [1] [2] [3]. Politico and video archives show Trump performing an impression of a reporter during a campaign event, and news organizations documented broad criticism and debate about whether the imitation targeted Kovaleski’s disability [7] [1] [3].
2. Defenses, denials and fact‑checking around the Kovaleski moment
Trump denied he was mocking a disability, saying he was imitating the reporter “groveling” and later argued he didn’t know what Kovaleski looked like; fact‑check and investigative pieces (e.g., Snopes, PolitiFact coverage summarized by Denver7) noted evidence contradicting that claim, including Kovaleski’s own statement that he and Trump had interacted previously, and observers who said the imitation mirrored Kovaleski’s posture [8] [9]. Fact‑checkers differed in emphasis on intent versus effect, but reporting shows widespread public perception that the clip mimicked a disability [8] [9].
3. Later references and alleged patterns: mocking speech and “mentally disabled” language
After 2015, commentators and advocacy groups highlighted other instances they say fit a pattern: Progressive.org and ADA Watch urged responses after reports that Trump mimicked President Biden’s stutter at rallies, framing it as continued mockery of disability; the same outlet connected that behavior to broader advocacy calls for apology and sensitivity [4]. Reporting in 2024 also recorded Trump using phrases such as “mentally impaired” and “mentally disabled” about Vice President Kamala Harris, drawing concern from disability‑rights advocates like The Arc of the United States [5].
4. Social media revivals and political context
Video clips of the 2015 impersonation have resurfaced in later political debates — for example, after Democrats used derogatory nicknames for politicians, social media users compared those attacks to Trump’s earlier impersonation, and outlets like Newsweek noted renewed viral interest in the Kovaleski footage when such analogies were made [6]. Coverage typically places the gestures in political contexts where opponents’ language is being compared and judged on standards of decency and political rhetoric [6].
5. Disability‑advocacy responses and offers of remediation
Advocacy groups publicly rebuked Trump after the 2015 incident; the Ruderman Family Foundation offered sensitivity training and emphasized that mocking a person’s disability is unacceptable in public discourse, as PBS reported [2]. Disability‑rights organizations and commentators continued to interpret subsequent comments through that lens, calling for accountability and apologies [2] [4].
6. What the available reporting does and does not establish
Available sources document multiple episodes widely interpreted as mocking physical or cognitive disabilities — especially the Kovaleski 2015 imitation and later “mentally disabled” language about political rivals — and they record both denials from Trump and rebuttals from journalists, fact‑checkers and advocates [1] [3] [8] [5]. Sources do not provide an exhaustive list of every time Trump has ever commented on people with disabilities; available sources do not mention a comprehensive catalogue beyond these highlighted episodes [4] [6].
7. How to read competing perspectives
News organizations (BBC, PBS, People, Politico) reported the incidents and noted public criticism [1] [2] [3] [7]. Fact‑checkers and columns (Snopes, Denver7/PolitiFact) examined intent claims and found evidence undermining some denials [8] [9]. Opinion and advocacy pieces framed the behavior as part of a pattern of ableist rhetoric [10] [4] [11]. Readers should weigh on‑the‑record video and contemporaneous reporting against later defenses and political framing when assessing intent versus impact [3] [8].
If you want, I can compile the primary video transcripts and direct quotes from each cited report so you can judge the clips and the competing explanations side‑by‑side (sources above).