Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Time left: ...
Loading...Goal: $500

Fact check: Which countries were involved in the conflicts Trump claims to have stopped?

Checked on August 14, 2025

1. Summary of the results

Based on the analyses provided, Trump has claimed to have stopped or brokered peace deals involving multiple countries and conflicts. The most frequently mentioned conflicts include:

  • Russia-Ukraine war [1]
  • Israel-Iran war [1] [2]
  • Israel-Hamas fighting in Gaza [1]
  • India-Pakistan conflict [3] [1] [4] [2]

Additional conflicts mentioned in White House sources include:

  • Azerbaijan-Armenia ceasefire [4] [2]
  • Thailand-Cambodia [4] [2]
  • Democratic Republic of Congo-Rwanda [1] [4] [2]
  • Egypt-Ethiopia [2]
  • Serbia-Kosovo [2]
  • Abraham Accords (involving Middle Eastern nations) [2]

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

The analyses reveal significant contradictory evidence regarding Trump's claims:

  • India directly refutes Trump's claims, stating that any India-Pakistan resolution was bilateral and not facilitated by Trump [3]
  • Multiple sources note that no conclusive evidence exists that Trump actually ended the Russia-Ukraine, Israel-Iran, or Israel-Hamas conflicts [1]
  • The Heritage Foundation and White House sources present Trump as successfully brokering multiple peace deals [4] [2], while other analyses suggest these claims lack substantiation

Key stakeholders who benefit from accepting Trump's narrative include:

  • Trump himself - enhancing his foreign policy credentials
  • The Heritage Foundation - a conservative think tank that supports Trump's policies
  • White House officials - promoting the administration's achievements

Those who benefit from challenging this narrative include:

  • Foreign governments like India that dispute U.S. involvement in their bilateral agreements
  • Political opponents who question Trump's foreign policy effectiveness

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original question assumes Trump's claims are factual by asking "which countries were involved in the conflicts Trump claims to have stopped" rather than questioning whether he actually stopped any conflicts. This framing accepts the premise without verification.

The analyses reveal that:

  • Official White House sources present extensive lists of peace deals [2], but these claims are disputed by involved parties like India [3]
  • Independent analyses find no conclusive evidence that Trump ended major ongoing conflicts like Russia-Ukraine or Israel-Hamas [1]
  • There appears to be a significant gap between Trump administration claims and verifiable outcomes, suggesting potential exaggeration or misrepresentation of diplomatic achievements
Want to dive deeper?
What were the key conflicts during Trump's presidency from 2017 to 2021?
How did Trump's foreign policy approach differ from his predecessors?
Which countries did Trump impose sanctions on during his term in office?
What role did Trump play in the Middle East peace process between 2017 and 2021?
How did Trump's withdrawal from international agreements impact global conflict resolution?