Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Time left: ...
Loading...Goal: $500

Fact check: What were the 6 wars or conflicts Trump allegedly stopped since taking office in January 2025?

Checked on August 13, 2025

1. Summary of the results

The analyses reveal conflicting claims about Trump's alleged success in stopping wars since taking office in January 2025.

Supporting evidence comes primarily from one White House source that lists seven specific conflicts Trump allegedly resolved: Azerbaijan and Armenia, Cambodia and Thailand, Israel and Iran, Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo, India and Pakistan, Egypt and Ethiopia, and Serbia and Kosovo [1]. This exceeds the six conflicts mentioned in the original question. Additional sources mention Trump's claims regarding the Israel-Iran war, Russia-Ukraine war, Israel-Hamas fighting in Gaza, and India-Pakistan conflict [2] [3].

However, contradictory evidence strongly challenges these claims. Multiple sources indicate that conflicts are currently raging on multiple fronts, including between Iran and Israel, and in Ukraine, with Trump's efforts to resolve these conflicts being unsuccessful [3]. One analysis specifically states that Trump's messaging on these conflicts has been mixed and inconsistent [3].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

The original question lacks crucial context about the ongoing nature of several major conflicts. Sources indicate that rather than being resolved, conflicts in Iran, Israel, and Ukraine continue to escalate [3].

Critical missing information includes:

  • The Azerbaijan-Armenia peace deal is described as only a "potentially historic turning point" rather than a complete resolution [4]
  • Trump's failed bid to end the Ukraine war and subsequent meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin to repair this failure [5]
  • The administration's focus on other policy areas such as executive actions, tariffs, and immigration rather than conflict resolution [5] [6]

Alternative viewpoints suggest that Trump's foreign policy approach has "left America weak and jeopardized security and economic stability" [7] and has been characterized by "global chaos, American weakness, and human suffering" [7].

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original question contains significant potential misinformation by presenting as fact that Trump "stopped" six wars, when the evidence shows this claim is highly disputed and contradicted by multiple sources.

Key biases and inaccuracies:

  • Premature victory claims: The question assumes conflicts have been definitively "stopped" when evidence suggests they remain active and unresolved [3]
  • Selective sourcing: The primary supporting evidence comes from White House sources [1], which have inherent bias toward presenting the administration's achievements favorably
  • Contradictory evidence ignored: The question fails to acknowledge that multiple independent sources report ongoing conflicts and unsuccessful peace efforts [3] [7]

The Trump administration and its supporters would benefit significantly from society accepting the narrative of successful conflict resolution, as it would enhance Trump's reputation as a "peacemaker" and validate his foreign policy approach. However, the evidence suggests this narrative may be premature or inaccurate given the ongoing nature of several major international conflicts.

Want to dive deeper?
What were the major conflicts ongoing when Trump took office in January 2025?
How does Trump's conflict resolution record compare to his predecessors?
Which specific wars or conflicts did Trump claim to have stopped or de-escalated since 2025?
What role did diplomacy play in Trump's conflict resolution efforts since 2025?
How have international leaders and organizations responded to Trump's conflict resolution claims since 2025?