Fact check: Which of Trump's convictions have been overturned so far in 2025?

1. Why the question matters now — convictions, appeals and immunity collide

The supplied material frames 2025 as a year when appeals and immunity doctrines have become central to Trump’s post-conviction strategy, but none of the pieces assert that an appellate court or the Supreme Court has overturned a conviction through October 15, 2025. Coverage emphasizes that the Supreme Court’s rulings on immunity could reshape how lower courts evaluate charges tied to presidential acts, yet the documents explicitly note the absence of a recorded reversal of any conviction in 2025 ^{[5] [2]}. That means the immediate legal status of convictions remained unchanged in the sourced record even as broader constitutional rulings created potential new grounds for defense arguments.

2. What the Supreme Court rulings changed — broad presidential immunity and its ripple effects

The supplied analyses describe a Supreme Court decision in mid‑2025 granting expansive immunity principles for official presidential acts, a ruling that commentators say could affect the scope of prosecutions related to election subversion and other conduct alleged to be official acts. The sources make clear the Court’s guidance focused on immunity doctrines rather than directly overturning convictions; reporting indicates the decision may provide appellate arguments but does not itself vacate existing criminal judgments documented in the sources ^{[2] [3]}. Consequently, the ruling is a consequential legal development that changes the landscape of appeals without automatically nullifying convictions.

3. Reporting consensus — multiple outlets find no overturns by mid‑October

Across the supplied analyses, outlets and summaries converge on the same factual point: no convictions were reported as overturned by the cited dates. Articles that review Trump’s four criminal cases and related sentencing references underscore ongoing litigation and potential future appeals but stop short of documenting any successful reversals in 2025 ^{[5] [1]}. This consistency across sources suggests that, within the timeframe covered by these reports, the factual status remains stable: convictions exist while legal challenges and immunity decisions may influence, but had not yet produced, overturned determinations.

4. Differing emphases — legal mechanics versus political context

The materials vary in emphasis: some pieces focus on procedural mechanics, such as sentencing delays and how immunity arguments could be raised on appeal, while others situate the developments in the broader political narrative of Trump’s candidacy and public standing ^[1]. Neither approach contradicts the central factual claim that no reversal occurred in 2025 per the supplied records. The legal analyses stress that immunity rulings create potential appellate pathways, while political reporting highlights uncertainty and the practical impact on sentencing schedules and public perception.

5. What’s not in the supplied record — potential gaps and open questions

The supplied analyses do not include explicit appellate opinions or orders vacating convictions, nor do they provide detailed docket entries showing final appellate outcomes through October 15, 2025. This omission indicates that the sources available to this analysis document constitutional rulings and ongoing litigation rather than concrete post‑conviction reversals ^{[4] [6]}. Therefore, while the supplied material supports the claim that no convictions were overturned in 2025, it also leaves open the possibility that later filings, unpublished orders, or sources beyond this dataset could show different developments after the cited cutoff.

6. How to interpret the legal trajectory — likely next steps after immunity guidance

Based on the supplied sources, the practical trajectory is that defense teams may now press immunity arguments in ongoing appeals and in trials yet to be resolved, seeking vacatur or dismissal where courts find alleged conduct falls within presidential authority. The analyses emphasize that such arguments are newly reinforced by the Supreme Court rulings but require separate adjudication in each case and do not produce automatic reversal of convictions reported in the sources ^{[4] [2]}. Thus the legal process remains iterative: immunity rulings create routes to challenge convictions, but overturning requires additional court decisions.

7. Bottom line for the record cited here — what you can reliably say

Using only the supplied analyses and their dates, the verifiable statement is straightforward: none of Donald Trump’s convictions were overturned in 2025 through October 15, 2025; reporting and legal summaries note significant Supreme Court immunity rulings that may affect future appeals but do not document any successful reversals within the dataset’s timeframe ^{[1] [2]}. Any definitive update beyond this point would require consulting subsequent court filings and reporting after the supplied cutoff.