Did Trump measure girl vaginas with Epstein
Executive summary
The specific claim that Donald Trump "measured the girls' vulvas and vaginas by penetrating them with his finger and rating them based on tightness" appears verbatim in tips that were included in the Justice Department’s recent public release of millions of Epstein-related documents; those tips are recorded in FBI/DOJ files but are unverified and, in some instances, were categorized by investigators as not credible [1] [2] [3]. There is no record in the released files that the allegation was corroborated by investigators, resulted in criminal charges, or that victims of Epstein’s prosecution identified Trump as a perpetrator, and the DOJ has warned that the production includes submissions from the public that may be false or fabricated [2] [3] [1].
1. The allegation appears in the released Epstein files and is graphic in wording
Multiple media outlets quoting the newly released DOJ documents report an anonymous tip alleging that at so-called “calendar girls” parties Jeffrey Epstein brought underage girls to gatherings at properties including Mar‑a‑Lago and that the tip claimed Trump participated in sexualized examinations of the girls, specifically “measured the children’s vulva and vaginas by entering a finger and rated the children on tightness” [1] [4] [5]. The phrasing and content of that allegation are present in the FBI summary spreadsheets and email exchanges that were produced as part of the DOJ’s disclosure, and it circulated widely in press accounts summarizing the dump [2] [6].
2. The Justice Department and FBI cautioned readers about reliability of these submissions
The DOJ explicitly noted that the mass production included material the public had sent to the FBI and warned that the responsive production “may include fake or falsely submitted images, documents or videos,” a point DOJ and White House spokespeople pointed to when responding to sensational claims in the release [1] [3]. Media reporting on the FBI’s internal summaries also notes that the bureau labeled some of the items “false” or otherwise uncorroborated in its own notes, indicating the agency treated many of the incoming tips as allegations pending verification rather than established facts [4] [7].
3. There is no indication in the released material that the allegation was substantiated or led to charges
News organizations summarizing the files emphasize that the documents do not show the allegations against Trump were substantiated or resulted in prosecution, and that Trump has repeatedly denied wrongdoing related to Epstein while not having been charged by prosecutors in connection with Epstein’s crimes [2] [3]. Reporting from multiple outlets and the DOJ’s own framing make clear that an allegation’s presence in the disclosure is not evidence of criminal conduct without corroboration or prosecutorial action [2] [7].
4. Why such claims surfaced and how to interpret anonymous tips in released files
Investigative releases of millions of pages create a raw stream of leads, rumors, and third‑hand accounts; the FBI’s National Threat Operation Center and other hotlines historically collected many uncorroborated reports, some of which were later annotated as not credible or remained unexplored in depth in the public record [7]. The DOJ release therefore mixes material that ranges from investigatory leads to anonymous, potentially fabricated allegations; the department’s statement accompanying the files and the bureau’s internal notations both underscore that media summaries of individual explosive claims must be read against that context [1] [3].
5. Bottom line and reporting limits
The allegation that Trump measured underage girls’ genitals with Epstein appears in the publicly released DOJ/Epstein files as an unverified tip and was widely reported by the press, but the documents and contemporaneous DOJ commentary indicate it was not corroborated in the release, was sometimes labeled “false” by investigators, and did not produce charges or confirmed victim testimony naming Trump in the prosecution of Epstein [1] [4] [2]. Beyond the released records and public statements cited above, available reporting does not provide verified evidence that the act occurred; the records themselves and the DOJ’s caveats limit what can be asserted from the documents alone [3] [1].