Fact check: Trump is a sexual predator as documented that he was a close friend of epstein. trump also uses the epstein jet still in 2025

1. Summary of the results

The original statement contains several claims that require careful examination:

• Trump and Epstein were indeed friends during the late 1980s and 1990s ^[1], with Epstein even describing Trump as his "closest friend" in recordings ^[2].
• Flight logs confirm Trump flew on Epstein's plane seven times between 1993-1997, often with his wife Marla Maples and children ^{[3] [1]}.
• However, there is no evidence supporting current ^[4] usage of any Epstein-related aircraft, though the Trump campaign briefly used a formerly Epstein-owned plane in August 2024 for campaign travel ^[1].
• Importantly, Trump has never been accused of involvement in Epstein's sexual crimes ^[3], and court documents mention Trump without allegations of wrongdoing ^[5].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

Several crucial pieces of context are missing from the original statement:

• Trump and Epstein had a documented falling out before Epstein's first arrest in 2005 ^[1].
• Trump actually banned Epstein from Mar-a-Lago after Epstein allegedly harassed a member's daughter ^[6].
• The relationship between Trump and Epstein was complex - recordings show Epstein simultaneously claiming friendship while criticizing Trump's character ^[2].
• While they were social acquaintances, no definitive evidence proves Trump's direct involvement in Epstein's criminal activities ^[1].

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original statement contains several misleading elements:

• It falsely claims current ^[4] usage of "the Epstein jet" - this appears to be a mischaracterization of the Trump campaign's brief use of a formerly Epstein-owned plane in 2024 ^[1].
• It implies ongoing connection between Trump and Epstein, ignoring their documented falling out ^[6].
• The statement makes serious allegations of sexual predation without providing evidence, while multiple sources explicitly state no such evidence exists ^{[3] [5]}.

This type of narrative could benefit:

• Political opponents looking to associate Trump with Epstein's crimes
• Media outlets seeking sensational headlines
• Social media engagement through controversial claims

The reality appears more nuanced than the original statement suggests, with documented past connections but also clear boundaries and separations that occurred before Epstein's criminal activities became public.