Which border wall segments built under the Trump era have been repaired, removed, or reinforced since 2021?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Since 2021 the federal record shows a mix of repair work, removals, targeted reinforcement and new construction tied to Trump-era border barriers: DHS/CBP began repairing flood-control and erosion damage in 2021 (DHS statement), Arizona removed a makeshift shipping‑container barrier in late‑2022, and both Biden and the second Trump administration have authorized new contracts or waivers to finish, reinforce or add secondary panels on stretches first started under Trump [1] [2] [3]. Sources disagree on scale: GAO and CBP figures show roughly 450–458 miles installed by January 2021, mostly replacements, while more recent reporting documents project-by-project repairs, wildlife openings and new contracts to add or reinforce segments [4] [5] [6].
1. What was in need of repair after Trump’s first term — and what was actually fixed
The Biden DHS immediately paused new construction on Jan. 20, 2021 but announced it would “quickly repair” damage — notably broken flood barriers in the Rio Grande Valley and improperly compacted soil in San Diego — citing risks to border communities and infrastructure [1] [7]. The Government Accountability Office told Congress that about 458 miles of panels were installed through January 2021 and identified environmental and cultural damages needing remediation, estimating large repair needs and urging DHS and Interior to plan mitigation [4]. Reporting says DHS identified some unspent CBP funds and planned repairs, but a comprehensive, mile‑by‑mile public accounting of every repaired Trump‑era segment is not provided in the sources [1] [4]. Available sources do not mention a definitive list of every repaired segment.
2. Removals and state projects: the shipping‑container episode in Arizona
A high‑profile removal occurred when Arizona’s double‑stacked line of shipping containers — a state‑level makeshift barrier installed during 2022 — was ordered removed after the federal government sued; state officials acknowledged work ceased and the containers were later removed from Coronado National Forest [2] [8]. Conservation groups and local reporting frame this as a distinct episode from federally built Trump bollard fencing; it was a state initiative that was dismantled after legal pressure and forest restoration requirements [2] [8].
3. Reinforcements and “secondary” walls: recent federal moves to strengthen existing panels
In 2023–2025 both administrations authorized targeted work to close “critical openings” left incomplete during prior contracts and to reinforce vulnerable points. The Biden administration waived federal laws to allow limited construction in South Texas and closed gaps in places like Yuma, while CBP continued to contract for finishing work left over from FY2019–2021 appropriations [9] [10]. Under the second Trump administration, CBP awarded new contracts (e.g., a $70M contract for ~7 miles in Hidalgo County) and announced plans to add secondary waterborne and reinforced barriers in multiple sectors, signaling ongoing reinforcement of Trump‑era segments as well as new parallel systems [3] [6] [11].
4. Repairs vs. replacement: how counts and definitions shape claims
CBP and watchdogs note most miles attributed to the Trump program replaced existing shorter barriers: roughly 81% of panels through January 2021 replaced prior barriers, and only about 52 miles were new primary systems by one CBP-based count — a distinction that matters when asking whether barriers were “repaired” or newly built or reinforced [4] [12] [13]. Journalistic and watchdog sources emphasize that much of the post‑2021 activity has been patchwork (repairs, mitigation, gap closures) rather than uniform demolition or wholesale removal of the Trump panels [4] [1].
5. Environmental and tribal impacts shaped repair priorities — and lawsuits shaped outcomes
GAO and conservation reporting document significant natural and cultural resource damage from rushed construction; GAO urged clearer roles and funding for mitigation and repair, and groups sued or negotiated to force restorations and wildlife openings [4] [14]. Those legal and interagency pressures influenced which segments were repaired, where removal occurred (the Coronado National Forest containers) and where exemptions/waivers later allowed new or reinforcing construction [2] [9] [4].
6. What the sources do not show — and why that matters
No single public dataset in these sources lists every Trump‑era segment and tracks, by mile, which were repaired, removed, or reinforced since 2021. Reporting offers case studies (San Diego levee repairs, Arizona container removal, Hidalgo County contracts) and program‑level totals (458 miles built through Jan. 2021; CBP contracting since 2025), but a comprehensive map tying each action to a named Trump segment is not present in available reporting [4] [5] [3]. Therefore precise accounting at the segment level is not possible from these sources.
Bottom line: federal records and reporting document repairs to flood‑control and erosion damage, the removal of state‑installed container barriers in Arizona, and multiple instances of reinforcement/finishing work and new contracts that affect Trump‑era barrier lines — but a segment‑by‑segment, publicly available ledger of repaired, removed or reinforced Trump‑era wall segments is not included in the sources reviewed [1] [2] [4] [3].