Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Time left: ...
Loading...Goal: $500

Fact check: Donald trump executive order mail in ballots and voting machines

Checked on August 20, 2025

1. Summary of the results

Based on the analyses provided, Donald Trump has announced plans to issue an executive order targeting mail-in ballots and voting machines, claiming these systems are corrupt and fraudulent [1] [2]. Trump wants to stop states from voting by mail and using voting machines as part of his broader election reform agenda [3].

However, most legal experts agree that the president does not have the constitutional authority to change voting laws [1]. The U.S. Constitution does not give the president the power to unilaterally make such changes, and Congress is the entity that can implement national election rules [4]. Any significant changes to voting procedures would require action from Congress rather than executive orders [3].

Fact-checkers have concluded that Trump's statements about mail-in voting and voting machines are false or misleading [5] [6]. Multiple sources cite evidence from various countries that use mail-in voting without significant issues and note that Trump's own administration found no evidence of widespread voter fraud [5].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

The original query lacks several crucial pieces of context:

  • Constitutional limitations: The analyses reveal that presidential executive orders cannot override state election laws or constitutional provisions that give states primary authority over election administration [4] [1].
  • Security measures already in place: One analysis discusses the security measures in place for voting machines and the lack of evidence for widespread voter fraud [7], providing important context about existing safeguards.
  • International influence allegations: Multiple sources suggest that Trump's claims may have been influenced by Russian President Vladimir Putin, who allegedly told Trump that mail-in voting is a scam [2]. This represents a significant geopolitical dimension missing from the original statement.
  • Historical precedent: The analyses indicate that Trump has spread lies about the voting system in the past [7] and has promoted false information about voting machines and voter fraud [8], establishing a pattern of behavior.

Election officials are currently dealing with a tsunami of voting conspiracy theories and misinformation [8], suggesting this executive order proposal is part of a broader campaign of election-related claims.

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original statement presents Trump's executive order plans as a straightforward policy proposal without acknowledging several critical issues:

  • Constitutional impossibility: The statement fails to mention that such an executive order would likely be unconstitutional and unenforceable [1] [3] [4].
  • Lack of evidence: The statement doesn't address that fact-checkers have repeatedly debunked Trump's claims about mail-in voting fraud [5] [6] and that his own administration found no evidence of widespread voter fraud [5].
  • Potential foreign influence: The statement omits the allegations that Trump's anti-mail-in-voting stance may have been influenced by Vladimir Putin [2], which could represent a significant conflict of interest.

The framing suggests legitimacy for claims that multiple fact-checking organizations have determined to be false or misleading [5] [6], potentially amplifying misinformation about election security and integrity.

Want to dive deeper?
What was the impact of Donald Trump's executive orders on the 2020 election?
Can the US President unilaterally change voting machine regulations?
How do mail-in ballots affect voter turnout in US elections?
What are the security protocols in place for US voting machines?
Did Donald Trump's executive orders on voting machines influence the 2024 election?