Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: What are the most significant falsehoods spread by Trump in 2025?
Executive Summary
Former President Donald Trump propagated several significant falsehoods and misleading items in 2025 that span public health claims, political conspiracies, and AI-manipulated media. Key recurring themes include false statements about autism rates among the Amish, repeated debunked economic and immigration assertions, circulation of AI-generated or AI-enhanced media purporting official actions or health information, and promotion of fringe conspiracy narratives including “medbeds” and an implausible claim that President Biden had been executed and replaced; these claims were widely challenged and often removed or labeled misleading by fact-checkers and journalists [1] [2] [3] [4] [5].
1. The Amish and autism: a false absolute that ignored nuance and evidence
Trump asserted that the Amish “have essentially no autism,” a categorical claim contradicted by public-health experts and scholarly reviews. Reporting in late September 2025 documented that autism does occur in Amish populations, and lower measured prevalence likely reflects underdiagnosis and cultural differences in reporting, not absence of the condition [1] [6]. Independent reviews and a 2011 Pediatrics study were referenced by reporters to show a more complex picture, and fact-checkers concluded Trump’s phrasing transformed an uncertain epidemiological issue into an absolute falsehood, minimizing important considerations about access to diagnostics and health disparities [1] [6].
2. A pattern of recycled debunked claims on policy and numbers
Fact-checkers compiled multiple instances from Trump’s 2025 public appearances where he repeated earlier debunked assertions on inflation, immigration, and tariffs, showing a pattern of misinformation across topics. Journalistic reviews in September 2025 highlighted that several claims had already been fact-checked in prior months and were contradicted by official statistics or mainstream reporting, underscoring that these were not isolated errors but recurring narratives advanced in high-profile settings [2]. The aggregate effect amplified misleading impressions about governance and policy outcomes, affecting public understanding on measurable issues.
3. AI-manipulated media: fake bans and doctored images spreading fast
Multiple instances in 2025 involved AI-created or AI-enhanced media falsely attributed to Trump. A viral video claiming Trump had announced a ban on Tesla production was an AI-generated parody with no corroborating reporting, and analysts warned it was intentionally misleading [3]. Separately, an AI upscaling of a low-resolution photo introduced artifacts that sparked unfounded health speculation, with experts explaining that enhancement tools often invent or distort facial detail, making the image unreliable as evidence [7]. Both episodes illustrate how synthetic media can fabricate apparent official acts or physical conditions.
4. Promoting fringe tech conspiracies: ‘medbeds’ amplified then retracted
In late September 2025 Trump shared—and later deleted—an AI-generated video that promoted the so-called “medbed” conspiracy, a fringe idea alleging secret devices can instantaneously heal illnesses. News outlets documented that the post energized QAnon-aligned and other fringe communities, and journalists described the video’s origin as AI-created promotional material rather than vetted reporting [4] [8]. The deletion did not erase the spread; fact-checkers and reporters warned that endorsement from a high-profile figure confers credibility to implausible claims, increasing misinformation circulation even after removal.
5. Extreme conspiracy about a president’s identity: resurfacing mythic claims
Reporting in mid-2025 recorded a widely debunked and extraordinary claim amplified by Trump and some online channels: that President Biden had been executed in 2020 and replaced by a robot clone. Mainstream coverage treated this as a baseless conspiracy long circulating online, reiterating that there is no credible evidence to support such an assertion and that similar theories have recurred in disinformation ecosystems [5]. Journalists framed Trump’s repetition as lending credibility to an implausible narrative that has no grounding in documented fact.
6. Cross-cutting threads: deletion, debunking, and amplification dynamics
Across these cases, the dynamics were similar: a provocative claim or synthetic media item was posted, rapidly amplified, and then contested by fact-checkers and experts; sometimes the content was deleted but the initial spread left lasting impressions [4] [3] [2]. Reporting in 2025 emphasized the role of platform mechanics, partisan networks, and AI tools in accelerating misinformation, and noted that deletion does not fully reverse dissemination—journalists and researchers flagged continuing circulation and reinterpretation even after corrections appeared [3] [4].
7. What the record shows and what it omits: evidence and agendas
The documented 2025 record shows multiple specific falsehoods and misleading items tied to Trump—public-health misstatements about the Amish, recycled political falsehoods, AI-based fabrications, promotion of conspiracies, and extreme identity claims about political opponents [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]. Coverage also reveals different agendas at play: political persuasion, entertainment or trolling, and fringe-movement mobilization, while omitting sustained engagement with underlying causes like diagnostic access or detailed policy context. The sources vary in perspective and timing, but collectively establish a pattern of repeated misinformation that was frequently corrected by journalists and experts [6] [8].