Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: How many immigrants entered the US under Trumps first term
1. Summary of the results
The question about immigration numbers during Trump's first term requires a nuanced analysis of different metrics. During his term, Trump deported approximately 1.5 million people [1], which was actually less than Obama's deportation numbers during his first term [1]. Border encounters during Trump's administration totaled approximately 6.4 million [2]. By the end of his presidency, monthly apprehensions had increased to over 71,000 in December 2020 and 75,000 in January 2021 [3].
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
Several important contextual factors need to be considered:
- Border apprehensions were actually 14.7% higher in Trump's final year compared to the year before he took office [3]
- The lowest point of immigration was in April 2020, attributed to the pandemic rather than policy effectiveness [3]
- The Trump administration set an ambitious goal of targeting 15 million people for removal [4]
- Immigration numbers are influenced by multiple factors beyond policy, including:
- Global crises
- Economic conditions
- Perception of immigration policies [2]
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The question itself oversimplifies a complex issue. Several potential sources of bias should be noted:
- Raw numbers of "entries" don't tell the complete story, as total encounters do not directly translate to net illegal immigration [2]
- The immigration system was reported as "overwhelmed," making large-scale removals logistically challenging [1]
- While Trump's administration emphasized increased enforcement and ICE arrests [4], the actual deportation numbers were comparable to Biden's 1.49 million deportations [1]
- Political rhetoric often focuses on absolute numbers without providing important context about systemic limitations and comparative historical data