How do flight logs and visitor records corroborate Trump's presence on Epstein's properties?

Checked on January 22, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

Flight logs and related visitor records released in recent DOJ document dumps and earlier trial exhibits place Donald Trump repeatedly in the orbit of Jeffrey Epstein during the 1990s, with contemporary flight manifests listing Trump as a passenger on Epstein’s private jet at least eight times between roughly 1993 and 1997 and photographs and press clippings showing the two socializing at properties such as Mar‑a‑Lago; the records corroborate presence and social association but do not, on their face, prove criminal conduct and are accompanied by DOJ warnings about unverified or sensational claims in the release [1] [2] [3] [4].

1. Flight logs as primary documentary evidence of travel together

Handwritten and produced flight logs from Epstein’s aircraft — materials that have been introduced as exhibits in related criminal proceedings — explicitly list “Donald Trump” as a passenger on multiple dates, and a January 7, 2020, email from an assistant U.S. attorney alerted colleagues that those records showed Trump “traveled on Epstein’s private jet many more times than previously has been reported,” specifying at least eight flights between 1993 and 1996 [1] [5] [3].

2. Passenger details and the company on board

The flight records and the prosecutor’s note add detail beyond mere co‑presence: they indicate that Ghislaine Maxwell was aboard at least four of the listed flights, that other flights included family members (Eric and Tiffany are named in one contemporaneous summary), and that on at least one flight the only passengers listed were Epstein and Trump, while another entry shows Epstein, Trump and a 20‑year‑old woman — specifics that were highlighted by multiple outlets after the files were released [5] [6] [7].

3. Visitor/photographic records confirm socializing at Epstein and Trump properties

Separate from aviation manifests, news photographs and contemporaneous press coverage document social interactions: Epstein and Trump were photographed together at Mar‑a‑Lago and at New York events in the 1990s and early 2000s, and the newly released tranche of documents includes many clippings and images that reference Trump at Epstein‑linked locations — corroborating that the two men visited each other’s properties and shared social spaces [2] [6] [3].

4. What the records corroborate — and what they do not

Taken together, flight logs, visitor lists, press photos and DOJ exhibits corroborate that Trump was physically present on Epstein’s plane multiple times and that he socialized with Epstein at properties like Mar‑a‑Lago; those are documentary confirmations of proximity and association, not evidence of criminal conduct, and several reporting outlets and the Justice Department emphasize that appearances on logs do not equal allegations of wrongdoing — the DOJ itself warned that some of the released documents include “untrue and sensationalist claims” and many files are redacted or context‑light [8] [4].

5. Limits of the public record and outstanding questions

The public releases consist largely of flight manifests, clipped news items, photographs and prosecutor notes rather than unambiguous contemporaneous guestbooks or full investigative narratives, so while they corroborate presence and repeated travel with Epstein, they leave gaps — including redactions, the absence of corroborating witness statements in many entries, and DOJ caveats about unverified submissions — meaning the documentary record supports assertions of association but cannot answer disputed allegations beyond placing Trump at Epstein’s properties or on his planes [9] [8] [4].

Want to dive deeper?
What do the Epstein flight logs reveal about other prominent passengers and their travel patterns?
How were Epstein’s flight logs authenticated and used as exhibits in the Maxwell and Epstein-related prosecutions?
What limitations and redactions exist in the DOJ’s Epstein file releases, and how do they affect public interpretation?