Fact check: How much did Trump's golf trips cost taxpayers in 2025?

1. Summary of the results

The cost of Trump's golf trips in 2025 is a topic of varying estimates and reports across different sources. According to ^[1], the total golf tab in Trump's second term is at least $52 million, with his Scotland trip costing American taxpayers $10 million ^[1]. Similarly, ^[1] and ^[1] also report that Trump's Scotland trip is costing taxpayers $10 million, with the total golf tab in his second term being at least $52 million ^[1]. However, ^[2] and ^[2] estimate the cost to taxpayers for Trump's golf trips since returning to office as $0, based on the average price per round calculated from the cost per trip identified within the GAO's 2019 Report ^[2]. On the other hand, ^[3] states that Trump's golf trips have already totalled $18 million in just 48 days, putting him on track to surpass the $151.5 million spent during his first term ^[3]. Key points to note are the significant discrepancies in the estimated costs and the lack of a unified figure across the sources.

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

Some sources provide additional context that is not directly related to the cost of Trump's golf trips in 2025 but is relevant to understanding the broader issue. For example, ^[4] and ^[4] mention that Trump has made 99 visits to his properties, including 62 visits to his golf courses, and that special interest groups, political committees, and foreign governments have held events at Trump properties, potentially generating revenue for Trump's businesses ^[4]. This information highlights the potential for conflicts of interest and the need for transparency in the financial dealings of public officials. Additionally, ^[5] reports that President Donald Trump's weekend stopover at his Trump Turnberry golf resort in Scotland in 2018 cost taxpayers over $1 million ^[5], providing a historical context for the costs associated with Trump's golf trips. Alternative viewpoints may include considering the economic benefits of these trips, such as job creation and local economic stimulus, although these are not explicitly mentioned in the provided analyses.

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original statement asks for the cost of Trump's golf trips in 2025 without providing any context or acknowledging the potential for varying estimates and biases in the reporting of these costs. The sources themselves may have different biases and agendas, with some potentially underestimating or overestimating the costs to fit their narrative. For instance, sources like ^[2] and ^[2] that estimate the cost as $0 may be seen as downplaying the financial impact of Trump's golf trips, while sources like ^[3] that report higher costs may be emphasizing the financial burden on taxpayers. Special interest groups, including those opposed to or supportive of Trump, may benefit from the dissemination of certain estimates over others, influencing public opinion and policy discussions ^[4]. Therefore, it is essential to consider multiple sources and evaluate the potential biases and motivations behind each analysis to form a comprehensive understanding of the issue ^{[2] [1] [5] [4] [3]}.