Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Goal: 1,000 supporters
Loading...

Fact check: Trump didn't aknowledge the minnesota congresswoman murder

Checked on September 13, 2025

1. Summary of the results

The original statement claims that Trump did not acknowledge the Minnesota congresswoman's murder. However, according to [1], Trump did acknowledge the murder, stating "horrific violence will not be tolerated" on Truth Social, although his response was brief and lacked urgency [1]. Multiple sources, including [2], [3], [2], and [3], support the claim that Trump gave scant attention to the congresswoman's killing and did not offer a substantial eulogy or attend the funeral, in contrast to his response to Charlie Kirk's death [2] [3]. Additionally, [4] notes that Trump's initial response to the murder was a brief condemnation on Truth Social, and he later refused to call Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, instead making a gratuitous swipe at him [4]. [5] reports that Trump skipped the funeral of the slain Minnesota lawmaker and her husband, and did not issue a statement about the funeral, in contrast to former President Joe Biden and former Vice President Kamala Harris who attended the service [5].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

A key missing context in the original statement is the comparison of Trump's responses to different tragedies, which is highlighted by multiple sources, including [6] and [2] [6] [2]. These sources suggest that Trump's response to the Minnesota congresswoman's murder was lacking in comparison to his response to Charlie Kirk's death, implying a partisan lens in his valuation of human life [6] [2]. Another alternative viewpoint is that Trump's response to the tragedy was not entirely absent, as noted by [1], which reports that Trump did acknowledge the murder on Truth Social, albeit briefly [1]. Furthermore, the sources do not provide a clear explanation for why Trump's response to the Minnesota congresswoman's murder was different from his response to other tragedies, which could be an important context to consider [2] [3].

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original statement may be misleading or biased because it claims that Trump did not acknowledge the Minnesota congresswoman's murder, when in fact, according to [1], Trump did acknowledge the murder on Truth Social [1]. This could be an example of cherry-picking information to support a particular narrative, which is a common bias in political discourse [2] [3]. Additionally, the sources that support the claim that Trump gave scant attention to the congresswoman's killing and did not offer a substantial eulogy or attend the funeral may be motivated by a partisan agenda, which could influence their interpretation of the facts [2] [3]. Overall, it is essential to consider multiple sources and perspectives to get a more accurate understanding of the situation and avoid potential misinformation or bias [2] [3] [1] [4].

Want to dive deeper?
What was Trump's official response to the Minnesota congresswoman's murder?
How did the Minnesota congresswoman's family react to Trump's silence?
What was the political context surrounding the Minnesota congresswoman's murder?
Did other politicians condemn Trump's lack of acknowledgement?
What were the circumstances surrounding the Minnesota congresswoman's death?