Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Loading...Time left: ...
Loading...Goal: $500
Fact check: What were the major immigration policy changes during Trump's first presidency from 2017-2021?
Checked on June 12, 2025
1. Summary of the results
The Trump administration implemented several major immigration policy changes between 2017-2021, with the most significant being:
- Border Wall Funding: Initially sought $5.7 billion, secured $1.375 billion through Congress, and redirected $8.1 billion through a national emergency declaration [1]
- Family Separation Policy: Implemented a "zero-tolerance" policy resulting in the separation of children from parents at the southern border [1]
- Travel Ban: Enacted restrictions on immigration from several Muslim-majority countries, facing multiple legal challenges [1]
- DACA Challenges: Attempted to end the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program but was blocked by federal courts [1]
- TPS Terminations: Ended Temporary Protected Status for multiple countries including Haiti, El Salvador, and Sudan [1]
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
The original question omits several crucial aspects of Trump's immigration policy:
- Enhanced Enforcement Measures: The administration expanded ICE's enforcement priorities and increased deportation efforts [1]
- Additional Border Policies:
- Increased military presence at the southern border
- Implemented the "Remain in Mexico" policy
- Removed the CBP One App platform for scheduling border crossings
- Significantly reduced refugee admissions [2]
- Asylum Restrictions: Specifically targeted and narrowed eligibility for victims of domestic and gang violence [1]
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The question itself doesn't contain misinformation, but it's important to note potential biases in how these policies are interpreted:
- Implementation vs. Intent: While all sources agree on the policies implemented [1], their characterization varies. Some view them as "systematic approach to significantly restrict immigration" [1], while others frame them as measures aimed at "reducing illegal immigration and tightening border security" [2]
- Beneficiaries of Different Narratives:
- Restrictive immigration advocates benefit from emphasizing security aspects
- Immigration advocates benefit from highlighting humanitarian impacts
- Political actors on both sides use these policies for campaign messaging
- Legal Context: Many of these policies faced significant legal challenges and court interventions [1], suggesting a tension between executive authority and judicial oversight
Want to dive deeper?
What was the impact of Trump's travel ban on Muslim-majority countries?
How did the Remain in Mexico policy affect asylum seekers during Trump's presidency?
What changes did Trump make to legal immigration and visa programs?
How effective was Trump's border wall construction in reducing illegal immigration?
What happened to DACA recipients during Trump's first term as president?