Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Time left: ...
Loading...Goal: $500

Fact check: Did Trump incite insurrection on January 6th?

Checked on June 13, 2025

1. Summary of the results

The question of whether Trump incited insurrection on January 6th is complex and has been extensively studied. Multiple academic sources confirm that Trump's social media activity and rhetoric had a direct correlation with the violence that occurred [1]. A Northwestern University study found that his tweets and rally speech predicted the magnitude of violence and weapon use during the Capitol attack [1]. Trump told supporters to "fight like hell" and directed them to the Capitol, with many rioters explicitly stating they were acting on his instructions [2].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

Several important contextual elements need to be considered:

  • Legal Complexity: Proving legal incitement is notably difficult, with legal experts describing Trump's case as "agonizingly close" [3]. Trump used specific language like "peacefully" which could serve as legal protection [3].
  • Pre-planned Violence: Some argue that the violence was pre-planned by organized militants rather than spontaneously incited [4].
  • Social Media's Role: Trump uniquely used "networked incitement" via social media, bypassing traditional media to directly communicate with supporters [5] [6]. 22 separate studies have discussed his role in the insurrection [6].
  • Aftermath Actions: Trump later pardoned nearly 1,600 people charged in connection with the Capitol attack [7].

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

Several parties have vested interests in how this event is portrayed:

  • Conservative Media: Organizations like Newsmax have attempted to create an "alternate universe" narrative about the events [8], benefiting from maintaining support among Trump's base.
  • Trump and Allies: They benefit from downplaying the events and supporting those involved [7], maintaining political influence and supporter loyalty.
  • Democratic Politicians: Benefit from emphasizing Trump's role, as evidenced by their introduction of impeachment charges [9].
  • Academic Institutions: Multiple universities and research organizations have conducted studies on this topic [1], potentially benefiting from research funding and academic recognition.

The original question oversimplifies a complex event that involves legal, social, and political dimensions that continue to impact American society.

Want to dive deeper?
What specific actions did Trump take on January 6th that are considered incitement?
How do legal experts define incitement to insurrection under federal law?
What was the timeline of events between Trump's speech and the Capitol breach?
How did the January 6th Committee conclude Trump's role in the events?
What are the different interpretations of Trump's 'fight like hell' and 'peacefully' statements?