Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Goal: 1,000 supporters
Loading...

Fact check: Trump’s “law and order” approach in DC has been more effective in a few weeks than Democrats were in 50 years fact check, provide false or partly false content

Checked on September 17, 2025

1. Summary of the results

The original statement claims that Trump's "law and order" approach in DC has been more effective in a few weeks than Democrats were in 50 years. However, most analyses contradict this claim. According to [1], Trump's claims about crime in Washington, D.C. are false, as there have been multiple murder-free stretches in 2025 alone, and hundreds of crimes have occurred during his takeover [1]. Additionally, [2] finds that the homicide rate in Washington, D.C. has actually dropped to 27.3 per 100,000 in 2024 and continued to decrease in 2025, with 49 other cities having higher homicide rates than Washington, D.C. in 2023 [2]. Furthermore, [3] reports that the nation experienced a historically low murder rate in 2023, and violent crime had plummeted to one of the lowest levels in 50 years, which contradicts the claim that Trump's approach has been more effective [3]. Overall, the evidence suggests that Trump's "law and order" approach has not been more effective than Democrats' in 50 years.

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

Some key context is missing from the original statement, including the actual crime rates in Washington, D.C. before and after Trump's takeover. According to [4], Trump's claims about the crime rate in Washington, D.C. are exaggerated, and the city's homicide rate has actually decreased in recent years [4]. Additionally, [5] reports that crime rates declined during the Biden administration, with a 13.2% decline in murders and a 5.7% decline in violent crime, which provides an alternative viewpoint on the effectiveness of Trump's approach [5]. It is also important to consider the broader trends in crime rates in the US, as reported by [6], which found that most US crime numbers went down last year, including a significant decline in murder [6]. These alternative viewpoints suggest that the relationship between Trump's "law and order" approach and crime rates is more complex than the original statement suggests.

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original statement appears to be misleading and biased in favor of Trump's "law and order" approach. According to [2], Trump's claim about Washington D.C.'s homicide rate being the highest in the world is false, and the data shows that the district's homicide rate has fallen considerably since 2023 [2]. Additionally, [7] reports that Trump's claims about crime in Washington D.C. are false, and that there have been other murder-free stretches in the city this year [7]. This suggests that Trump and his supporters may benefit from this framing, as it creates a narrative that his approach is effective in reducing crime. However, the evidence from multiple sources suggests that this narrative is not supported by the facts, and that a more nuanced understanding of crime rates and trends is necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of different approaches [1] [2] [3] [5] [7] [6].

Want to dive deeper?
What specific crime reduction policies did Trump implement in DC?
How do crime rates in DC compare to other major US cities under Democratic and Republican leadership?
What were the crime rates in DC over the past 50 years, and how did they change under different administrations?
Which law enforcement strategies have been most effective in reducing crime in urban areas?
How do experts assess the impact of 'law and order' approaches on community policing and trust in law enforcement?