Did trump auction off girls at mara lago and measure their genitals
Executive summary
Newly released items from the Jeffrey Epstein files include anonymous tips that allege “calendar girl” parties at Mar‑a‑Lago in which Jeffrey Epstein brought underage girls and that Donald Trump participated in auctions and sexually invasive “measurements” of children, including claims of digital penetration and rating girls on "tightness" allegations-trump-categorised-false-1769845667995" target="blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">[1] [2] [3]. Those claims are found in unverified complaint summaries and media reports about the DOJ document release; the White House has called the allegations unfounded, and there is no public record in these sources of law‑enforcement charges or a prosecution of Trump on these specific claims [4] [5] [3].
1. What the Epstein files’ new excerpts actually contain
Multiple outlets reporting on the Department of Justice’s recent Epstein document release describe one or more anonymous calls or complaint summaries lodged with the FBI’s National Threat Operations Center that assert Epstein ran “calendar girl” parties in which underage girls were brought to Mar‑a‑Lago, that Epstein supposedly “auctioned” girls for attendees, and that an accuser claimed Trump measured girls’ genitals with his fingers and rated them for tightness [1] [6] [7] [8].
2. Who made these allegations and how they reached the files
The allegations in the released pages appear as tips or complaint summaries submitted to an FBI tipline or whistleblower channel; media reports describe them as anonymous or from callers for whom agents could not establish contact, and some are preserved as unedited statements in the files [3] [9] [10]. Reporting repeatedly emphasizes that these are allegations contained in complaint documents rather than findings from an investigation disclosed in the same files [3] [11].
3. How officials and media have reacted
The White House response, as cited in multiple reports, labels these allegations “unfounded and false” and frames the broader Epstein material as politically weaponized against Trump, a position reiterated in several outlets that covered the release [12] [4]. News organizations publishing the claims vary from international tabloids and mainstream papers to outlets reproducing the complaint language; some reports note that parts of the DOJ’s online release were later removed or redacted, and that federal authorities flagged certain complaints as implausible or unverified [3] [11].
4. What the files do not show — investigative limits in the public record
None of the provided sources documents law‑enforcement corroboration, indictments, or prosecutions of Trump on the newly publicized sexual‑assault or trafficking allegations in the Epstein files; several articles explicitly state the allegations are contained in tips and that Trump has not been charged in relation to these specific claims in the materials cited [5] [3] [4]. The reporting also indicates some complaints lacked contact information or investigators were unable to reach the complainant, limiting follow‑up [3] [10].
5. Competing narratives, source reliability and possible agendas
Coverage is politically charged: sensational tabloids amplify lurid details from anonymous tips [12] [6], while officials push back claiming political motives [4]. The files’ release itself—part of DOJ transparency actions around Epstein materials—creates incentives for both outlets and political actors to highlight or dismiss allegations, and the anonymous nature of these tips, noted across reports, weakens their evidentiary weight without corroboration [3] [11].
6. Conclusion — direct answer to the question
The released Epstein‑related documents reported in the cited sources do contain anonymous allegations that Trump participated in auctions of underage girls at Mar‑a‑Lago and that he measured girls’ genitals with his fingers [1] [2] [7]. Those allegations, as presented in these sources, remain unverified tips or complaint summaries rather than findings supported by public investigative records or criminal charges in the materials cited, and the White House disputes them as false [3] [4]. The public record in the provided reporting therefore shows allegations in DOJ‑released files but does not establish proven, adjudicated facts that Trump actually committed the described acts.