Fact check: How many days has Trump spent at Mar-a-Lago since January 20 2025?

1. Summary of the results

Based on the available analyses, Trump spent approximately 35-40 days at Mar-a-Lago between January 20, 2025 and early May 2025. The most specific data comes from sources tracking his visits through different time periods:

• 35 days through May 4, 2025: Two sources confirm Trump spent "all or part of 35 days at his Mar-a-Lago Club" since taking office ^{[1] [2]}
• 31 days through April 29: One source specifically tracked "31 days through April 29" with an additional "four days at his club May 1-4" totaling the 35 days ^[2]
• 40 days in first 100 days: Another source reported Trump "spent parts of 40 days on his personal properties" during his first 100 days in office, though this includes all Trump properties, not just Mar-a-Lago ^[3]

The data shows Trump made nine separate trips to his Palm Beach County residence and golf clubs during this period ^[2].

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

Several important contextual elements are missing from the original question:

• Weekend pattern: Trump spent 12 of 14 weekends at one of his own properties according to NBC News tracking, indicating a consistent pattern of personal property visits ^[3]
• Historical comparison: Previous reporting mentioned Trump made "nearly 100 visits to Mar-a-Lago during his presidency," providing context for the frequency of these visits ^[4]
• Taxpayer costs: The financial impact on taxpayers is significant, with each Mar-a-Lago trip costing $3.4 million according to historical data ^[5]
• Business interests: Trump's continued use of his own properties raises questions about potential financial benefits to his business empire while serving as president

Beneficiaries of different narratives:

• Trump Organization benefits financially from presidential visits requiring Secret Service accommodations and staff
• Critics benefit from highlighting taxpayer costs and potential conflicts of interest
• Supporters benefit from portraying these as working vacations or legitimate presidential activities

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original question appears neutral and factual in nature, simply asking for a specific count of days. However, the framing could be seen as:

• Potentially loaded if used to suggest excessive time away from Washington D.C.
• Incomplete without context about presidential travel patterns or working nature of visits
• Missing temporal specificity - the question asks about time "since January 20 2025" but doesn't specify an end date, making precise answers difficult

The most recent data available only extends through early May 2025, so any answer would be incomplete for the full period since inauguration ^{[1] [2]}. Additionally, some sources conflate "visits" with "days spent," which could lead to confusion about the actual time spent at the property versus brief stops or partial days.