Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
How did Donald Trump's golf spending compare to Barack Obama's during their presidencies?
Executive Summary
Donald Trump’s presidential golf travel produced widely varying public cost estimates, but all informed analyses show substantially higher taxpayer costs tied to Trump’s golf and weekend travel than comparable metrics attributed to Barack Obama. Estimates in the supplied analyses range from roughly $60 million to over $340 million for Trump’s trips depending on methodology and timeframe, while Obama’s comparable travel figures cited in these sources cluster around $97–$114 million for broader travel across his two terms; Obama’s golf was described as “more or less local” and therefore typically less costly [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]. The differences reflect counting choices—whether to isolate strictly golf-related incremental security and transport costs, whether to include private gains tied to locations like Mar-a-Lago, and how to apportion multi-purpose presidential travel—so the headline comparison depends on which accounting method and period a source uses [2] [6] [7].
1. Conflicting Totals: Why the Price Tags for Trump’s Golf Vary So Widely
The supplied analyses present contradictory totals for Trump’s golf-related taxpayer costs because each uses different assumptions and datasets. One set of reports calculates a minimum of about $102–105 million by tallying documented trips and direct government expenditures through 2019, and contrasts that with Obama’s full eight-year travel total of roughly $114 million [1] [4]. Other organizations estimate much higher sums—$130–237 million or more—for Trump’s first term when they include broader security, advance teams, repeated use of Air Force One for short hops, and projected costs if Trump were re-elected [5] [7]. Methodological choices—such as counting only incremental costs caused by a trip versus allocating a share of standing White House operations—drive these gaps, and several sources explicitly note that counting conventions change the headline number substantially [2] [8].
2. Frequency versus Per-Trip Cost: Two Paths to Bigger Totals
A central factual split among sources is whether higher totals for Trump reflect more frequent outings or more expensive individual trips. Multiple analyses document that Trump undertook golf-related travel on a far greater number of days and rounds—reports cite 193+ visit days and up to 139 rounds compared with Obama’s lower outing counts—supporting the conclusion that increased frequency drove much of the added expense [2] [6]. Other pieces emphasize per-trip expense, noting that destinations such as Mar-a-Lago and Bedminster involved costly travel and security, with figures like $13.6 million on average per Mar‑a‑Lago trip mentioned in one account, and that use of Air Force One for relatively short golf hops magnified costs [3] [2]. Both channels—frequency and per-trip scale—are documented and together explain why Trump’s totals exceed earlier presidencies’ comparable figures [4] [6].
3. Apples-to-Oranges Risks: What Comparisons Omit About Obama’s Travel
Comparisons that show Trump outspending Obama frequently rely on partial apples-to-oranges comparisons. Several sources point out Obama’s golf outings were often local and reimbursed in part by political entities, and that Obama’s cited totals sometimes aggregate family travel and official travel into broader categories, complicating direct golf-only comparisons [1] [4]. One analysis frames Obama’s eight-year travel at roughly $97–114 million depending on whether family travel and reimbursements are included, but does not isolate golf-specific government expense on a like-for-like basis [5] [4]. Omissions matter: if Obama’s local golf trips required minimal secure air travel, direct comparators focusing on presidential flight hours or short-haul Air Force One use will systematically undercount his activities relative to Trump’s long-distance club visits [3] [6].
4. Sources, Dates, and Possible Agendas: Reading the Numbers Carefully
The set of analyses spans advocacy groups, mainstream outlets, and fact-checking sites, and they publish across several years—2017 through 2025—leading to evolving totals as more documents emerged; earlier projections (e.g., 2017 CAP and similar) forecast large cumulative costs, while later reporting refined totals with FOIA-driven figures [5] [1] [2]. Some outlets emphasize taxpayer burden and frame Trump’s trips as unusually extravagant, while others stress counting nuance or political reimbursements; these editorial choices can reflect an outlet’s mission or agenda and affect headline framing [3] [4]. The presence of wide date ranges and varying analytical lenses means the reader must treat any single dollar figure as provisional and tied to a specific set of counting rules and time boundaries [7] [8].
5. The Bottom Line: Comparable Patterns and Clear Differences
Across these diverse analyses, the consistent factual conclusion is that Trump’s golf and weekend travel generated higher documented taxpayer costs than estimates attributed to Obama when using comparable national accounting methods, driven by more frequent trips and costlier per-visit logistics. Exact totals vary—low‑hundreds of millions versus roughly a hundred million for Obama depending on which items are counted—but all credible enumerations supplied show a material gap in scale, not just marginal differences [2] [5] [4]. Readers should therefore treat headline numbers as method-dependent: the core fact is robust—Trump’s pattern of frequent, long-distance golf-related presidential travel resulted in substantially larger taxpayer bills than Obama’s largely local golf activity [3] [6].