Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
How do Trump's pardons compare to those of previous US presidents?
Executive Summary
Donald Trump’s use of the presidential pardon has been described as both unusually expansive in raw counts by some analyses and unusually targeted toward political allies and January 6-related actors by others; assessments clash because underlying tallies and definitions of “pardons” versus “acts of clemency” vary across data sets. The critical questions are magnitude, composition, and purpose: how many acts occurred, who benefited, and whether the pattern departs from historical norms — and those answers differ depending on which dataset or expert framing one accepts [1] [2] [3].
1. Numbers Tell Conflicting Stories — Who’s Counting What and Why It Matters
Public summaries of Trump’s pardons present widely divergent totals. Some analyses report totals in the mid-thousands — figures like 1,500 to 1,737 pardons — placing Trump among the more prolific users of clemency relative to many 20th- and 21st-century presidents [1] [4]. Other reporting emphasizes that Trump issued far fewer formal grants of individual petition-based pardons than recent predecessors, with counts such as roughly 238 pardons and a small number of commutations in certain time slices, emphasizing a sparse use of the traditional petition-review process [5] [3]. The discrepancy arises because some tallies combine post-presidency actions, mass or group actions, or include broad categories of “acts of clemency,” whereas other tallies isolate petitions granted after formal review. Clarifying definitions — pardon vs. commutation vs. other clemency acts — is essential to any apples-to-apples comparison [1] [5].
2. Composition: Allies, High-Profile Cases, and the January 6 Link
Beyond raw counts, observers focus on who received clemency under Trump. Multiple reports highlight a notable pattern of pardons and protections extended to political allies implicated in the 2020 election aftermath and January 6-related prosecutions, including figures like Rudy Giuliani, Mark Meadows, and Sidney Powell, which critics frame as favoring friends and political operatives [2] [6]. Supporters and some statements frame these acts as correcting perceived injustices and advancing “national reconciliation,” while critics call them examples of self-serving or transactional use of the clemency power. The composition therefore matters: a smaller total number of pardons concentrated on partisan allies reads differently from a larger total comprised mainly of routine or nonpolitical cases [6] [2].
3. Historical Context: Where Trump Sits Among Presidents
Historical comparisons show both continuity and divergence. Some presidents issued far more clemencies overall — figures cited for past leaders range from Franklin D. Roosevelt’s large number attributed to long tenure to Andrew Johnson’s massive post-Civil War pardons — and modern presidents vary widely in percentage of petitions granted [1] [7]. At the same time, analyses emphasize that Trump’s style resembles earlier examples where pardons had overt political overtones, rather than the mid-20th-century trend toward systematic petition review and a focus on nonpolitical rehabilitation. Thus, while Trump’s total may be high in some datasets, his pattern of recipient selection is notably different from presidents who emphasized nonpolitical pardons or rehabilitative commutations [1] [8].
4. Process and Petitions: A Different Approach to Clemency
Several sources note that Trump did not rely heavily on the formal petition process that presidents like Obama or Clinton used, granting a low percentage of merit-based petitions relative to the number received and favoring discretionary, high-profile interventions. Comparative figures show prior presidents approving higher percentages of petition-based requests, whereas Trump’s approvals represented a small share of submitted petitions, highlighting a preference for individualized, often high-visibility acts rather than broad petition-driven clemency [5] [3]. Critics argue this undermines institutional norms around clemency review; proponents argue it corrects perceived injustices that the system mishandled. The procedural break is central to debates about whether Trump’s clemency use is exceptional in substance or merely in optics [5].
5. What Analysts Agree On and Where Disagreement Persists
Analysts converge on two points: first, clemency under Trump produced significant controversy because of high-profile beneficiaries and perceived political motives; second, comparisons to past presidents depend critically on definitions and timeframes used by analysts [6] [4]. Disagreement persists over the true scale — whether Trump ranks among the top users by raw count — and over normative judgments about intent. Some sources treat his actions as a departure toward transactional pardons; others place him within a broader historical pattern of presidents using clemency for political allies at moments of partisan polarization [6] [1]. For readers seeking a definitive ranking, the key takeaway is that both magnitude and motive must be demonstrated with consistent data before drawing absolute conclusions [1] [2].