What exactly happened between Donald Trump and the Queen’s Guard during his last visit to King Charles?

1. What the supplied reporting actually covers: Trump and the U.S. National Guard

The documents you provided are centered on President Trump’s orders to federalize and deploy National Guard units inside U.S. cities, the creation of a large “quick reaction force” for crowd control (about 23,500 troops), and the ensuing legal and political pushback ^{[1] [4] [5]}. Coverage includes accounts of deployments to Washington, D.C., Los Angeles and plans for other cities, and mentions that judges and local officials have repeatedly challenged the legal basis for such domestic troop use ^{[6] [2] [7]}.

2. Legal and civic flashpoints the sources emphasize

Several pieces document court fights over the deployments: judges in Portland and elsewhere have been asked to decide whether federalized Guard troops may be used in ways critics say amount to local policing, and some courts have limited those deployments while others left troops in place pending rulings ^{[2] [3] [7]}. Reuters and other outlets describe city and state officials arguing that the administration’s justifications are exaggerated and that using troops for law enforcement raises constitutional and statutory concerns ^{[2] [3] [7]}.

3. Motives, planning and the policy context in the reporting

Reporting links the deployments to a broader Trump administration strategy to use federal forces to support immigration enforcement and “drive down violent crime,” and notes that some of these moves trace back to planning documents and conservative policy initiatives (Project 2025) discussed by administration advisers ^{[8] [4] [5]}. Sources present competing viewpoints: the administration frames deployments as necessary to protect federal property and personnel, while local officials and some judges call those claims insufficient or exaggerated ^{[3] [7]}.

4. What the supplied sources do not say about a Queen’s Guard incident

None of the supplied items mention King Charles, the Queen’s Guard, or any diplomatic visit to the U.K. involving a confrontation or notable interaction between Trump and British ceremonial guards. Therefore, claims about “what happened between Donald Trump and the Queen’s Guard during his last visit to King Charles” are not documented in the reporting you provided (not found in current reporting).

5. How to interpret the absence of coverage and next steps

An absence of mention in this dataset does not prove such an event never occurred; it only means the supplied sources do not report it. If you want definitive, sourced answers about an interaction with the Queen’s Guard, you should supply or permit searches of U.K. or international outlets that cover royal visits, or provide contemporary reports of that visit. With broader sources, I can then cite direct accounts, official statements from Buckingham Palace or the British Ministry of Defence, eyewitness reporting, or photographic/video evidence to confirm or refute any specific incident.

6. Competing perspectives and hidden agendas to watch for

When a high-profile leader’s foreign visit becomes fodder for claims of impropriety or spectacle, media narratives can diverge: government communications often minimize awkward moments, while political opponents and social media can amplify them; partisan outlets may use such events to reinforce larger political frames. In the supplied files, the clear agenda is reporting on domestic troop deployments and legal fights—not on diplomatic protocol—so be wary of extrapolating details about unrelated events from this set ^{[1] [2] [3]}.

If you want, I can (a) search other news databases specifically for coverage of Trump’s visits to King Charles or interactions with the Queen’s Guard, or (b) evaluate a specific claim or viral item if you paste it here and I check it against authoritative reporting.