Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: How did Donald Trump respond to the sexual misconduct allegations made by Jessica Leeds?
Executive Summary
Donald Trump has consistently and emphatically denied Jessica Leeds’s allegation that he groped her on an airplane in the late 1970s/early 1980s; he called the charge false, threatened legal action against The New York Times, and characterized accusers as liars and part of a coordinated media attack [1] [2] [3]. In later public statements and campaign appearances he added dismissive and personal remarks about Leeds — including saying she “would not be my first choice” and that he “wouldn't have been the chosen one” — prompting rebuttals from Leeds and fact-checks that challenged some of the campaign’s defenses [3] [4] [5] [6].
1. How Leeds first went public and the immediate presidential denials that followed
Jessica Leeds publicly recounted an alleged groping incident in a New York Times article published on October 12, 2016, saying Donald Trump touched her breasts and tried to put his hand up her skirt during a flight in the late 1970s or early 1980s; her account appeared amid several contemporaneous accusations that month [1]. Trump’s immediate response was categorical denial: he said “none of this ever took place,” threatened to sue the paper, and framed the reports as partisan and fabricated, describing the cluster of accusations as a “concerted, coordinated, and vicious attack” aimed at influencing the 2016 election [2] [3]. The administration and campaign repeatedly returned to litigation threats and broad denials rather than engaging with the specifics Leeds offered publicly [2] [3].
2. Specific rebuttals from Trump and the campaign’s narrative choices
Beyond blanket denials, Trump and his campaign made several pointed responses that aimed to undermine Leeds’s credibility: labeling her story “fiction,” calling her unattractive as a way to dismiss the claim, and asserting that accusers had been paid or were politically motivated [3] [2]. The campaign also offered technical defenses meant to discredit the logistics of the allegation, citing purported immovable first-class armrests to argue the scenario was implausible; that armrest claim, however, was contradicted by a 1979 flight attendant manual and later fact-checking [6]. The mixture of personal attacks, broad allegations of coordination, and technical rebuttals formed the core of the official defense [3] [6].
3. How Leeds and others responded to Trump’s later comments
When Trump later reiterated denials and added dismissive lines — including “she would not be my first choice” and, in another instance, that he “wouldn't have been the chosen one” — Leeds publicly rejected those replies as bizarre and disrespectful, saying he showed “no respect for women” and indicating legal advisers were evaluating responses [7] [4] [5]. Leeds told interviewers she “laughed out loud” at the attempts to minimize the incident and suggested Trump had convinced himself the assault did not happen [8] [5]. Her rebuttals focused on the substance of the allegation and the demeaning tone of Trump’s public replies rather than engaging with the campaign’s technical defenses [5] [8].
4. Independent checks, media context, and evolving public record
Contemporaneous reporting and later fact-checks recorded both the allegation and the campaign’s rebuttals, noting where factual claims could be verified or challenged; for example, the armrest argument was examined and found inconsistent with a period flight attendant manual and later reporting [6]. Major outlets documented Leeds’s account alongside other accusers, and they recorded Trump’s public denials at events such as the second 2016 presidential debate where he asserted he never groped anyone [1] [9]. The media record thus preserves both the allegation and the denials, along with efforts by news organizations to test the factual claims each side advanced [1] [6].
5. What remains settled fact and what remains disputed
Settled facts in the public record include that Jessica Leeds made a detailed allegation in October 2016 and that Donald Trump has repeatedly denied that the incident occurred, using both categorical denials and personal dismissals while threatening legal action [1] [2] [3]. Disputed matters include the factual specifics of the encounter — which lack contemporaneous public documentation beyond Leeds’s testimonial — the motivations ascribed to accusers, and the correctness of some campaign defenses such as the armrest claim, which was undermined by available manuals and fact-checks [6] [10]. The public record therefore contains firm statements of accusation and denial, but the core factual dispute about what precisely happened remains unresolved in the public domain [1] [2].