Does Trump like to get pissed on
Executive summary
There is no credible, publicly verified evidence that Donald Trump “likes to get pissed on”; the lurid “golden shower” claim originated in unverified dossier reporting in 2017 and has never been substantiated by primary evidence or independent confirmation [1] [2]. Reporting that documents many allegations of sexual misconduct against Trump exists, but those sources do not provide verified proof that he participates in urophilic acts [3] [4].
1. How the allegation entered public view
The specific story that Trump paid prostitutes to urinate in front of him traces to leaked dossier material published during the 2016–2017 transition and amplified on social media and some outlets in January 2017; journalists and analysts repeatedly described those items as disturbing but unconfirmed [1] [2].
2. What mainstream reporting and legal records actually show
Mainstream chronologies and legal records catalog dozens of sexual-misconduct allegations and some civil findings against Trump—most notably a jury finding him liable for sexual abuse in a case brought by E. Jean Carroll and other allegations compiled by outlets such as ABC News, The Guardian, PBS and others—but those documented accusations concern groping, assault, harassment and related behaviors and do not amount to corroborated evidence of the specific urophilia claim [5] [4] [6] [7].
3. The dossier claim remained unverified and contested
Multiple analysts and summaries of the dossier material and press coverage emphasized that the “golden showers” item was an unverified allegation; experts and outlets covering the story cautioned that the assertion was not backed by independently corroborated evidence and should be treated as such [2] [1].
4. Expert context on urophilia and how that shaped coverage
Psychological and popular-science writers used the allegation as a chance to explain urophilia—sometimes called undinism or “golden showers”—noting it is a documented sexual interest with variants such as voyeuristic watching of urination, masochistic enjoyment of being urinated upon, or other behaviors; those commentaries stressed that discussing the fetish is distinct from proving any individual’s participation in it [2] [1] [8].
5. Political responses and the risk of misinformation
Trump’s camp dismissed the dossier allegations as “fake news” and a political witch hunt, and sympathetic influencers and commentators have framed the story as politically motivated; other outlets and experts warned the allegation’s viral spread was an example of how salacious, unverified claims can dominate public attention even when they lack corroboration [8] [9].
6. Bottom line: does credible evidence exist that he “likes” being urinated on?
On the public record assembled by reputable reporting and legal documents provided in the sources at hand, there is no verified evidence that Donald Trump seeks or enjoys being urinated on; the specific “pissed on” claim remains an uncorroborated item from a leaked dossier and has not been proven in court or confirmed by independent reporting [1] [2] [5]. Reporting does, however, document numerous other sexual-misconduct allegations and at least one civil judgment finding sexual abuse liability—facts that are separate from and do not prove the urophilia allegation [3] [5].