Trump shits himself
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
There is no verified evidence that Donald Trump “soiled himself” at any public event; multiple fact-checkers have debunked viral clips and fabricated headlines claiming otherwise [1] [2] [3]. Viral videos and social posts showing people reacting to a smell or a noise have been amplified without corroboration, and some outlets that reported the rumors leaned on speculation rather than primary evidence [4] [5].
1. The strongest claims and where they originated
The most widely circulated claims come from short social-video clips and posts that interpret audience reactions as proof Trump defecated in public — examples include a clip from a dinner in France circulated on X and a moment from the Kennedy Center Honors ceremony — and sensational headlines in tabloids and social media that framed those reactions as evidence [4] [1].
2. What fact-checkers and mainstream outlets found
Independent fact-checkers reviewed the clips and available footage and found no substantiating evidence that Trump soiled himself; Snopes examined the Kennedy Center video and concluded there was no indication of an accident, describing the footage as miscaptioned [1], and Yahoo News Canada relayed the same conclusion based on that review [6]. USA Today and PolitiFact separately debunked claims that major networks reported an in-court incident, saying those headlines were fabricated and that CNN did not publish any such report [2] [3].
3. How ambiguous footage fuels rumor
Short, decontextualized clips can show people reacting to an odor or a sound without revealing its source; fact-checkers noted that in the Kennedy Center clip the honoree in the background was smiling and reacting to a joke and stood farther from Trump than some posts implied, undermining the viral interpretation [1] [6]. A similar dynamic occurred with the France dinner clip, where observers inferred an odor-related incident from viewers’ expressions but provided no corroborating visual or audio evidence that Trump was the source [4].
4. The role of partisan incentives and social virality
Political opponents, anonymous social accounts and tabloid outlets benefit from amplifying humiliating narratives about public figures, and sensational claims about bodily functions spread quickly because they’re emotionally charged and easy to share; outlets pushing the story sometimes relied on user-generated clips and speculation rather than independent verification [4] [3]. Fact-checkers flagged fabricated headlines and doctored screenshots, showing how misinformation can be framed to appear authoritative [3].
5. Counter-evidence and remaining unknowns
There is no authenticated video, photograph, or credible eyewitness account published by reliable outlets that confirms Trump soiled himself at the events in question; fact-checkers explicitly rated the claims as unproven or false in the specific Kennedy Center and court-related incidents they examined [1] [2] [3]. That said, absence of verified evidence in the public record is not the same as proving a negative beyond all doubt; the available reporting simply finds no corroboration for the allegation [1] [2].
6. Why this matter persists and what to watch for
Episodes like this persist because short-form video and outrage-driven commentary reward instant conclusions; credible debunking often arrives later and attracts less attention, so consumers should expect more click-driven reposts and should check fact-checking outlets and original footage before accepting sensational claims [1] [3]. When future clips emerge, verification steps include locating full-length footage from reputable broadcasters, official event photography, and confirmation from multiple independent witnesses — none of which the cited viral claims provided in these cases [1] [6].