How did the age distribution of Trump supporters in 2024 compare to his supporters in the 2016 election?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Donald Trump’s 2024 coalition skewed younger and more diverse on age lines than his 2016 coalition: voters under 50 comprised about 40% of Trump’s 2024 voters versus roughly 35% in 2016, reflecting notable gains among young and middle‑aged cohorts even as older voters remained central to his strength [1]. Exit polls and survey analyses show Trump improved among 18–29 and 50–64 cohorts while support among 65+ either softened or held steady depending on the data source, and analysts warn that differences in polling methodology and turnout complicate direct year‑to‑year comparisons [2] [3] [4].
1. The headline shift: a larger share of Trump voters were under 50 in 2024
Pew’s post‑election demographic profile found that voters under 50 made up 40% of Trump’s coalition in 2024, up from 35% in 2016, a clear relative increase that signals younger voters constituted a larger slice of his base than in his first run [1]. Multiple outlets corroborate movement among the young: AP VoteCast reported a bigger share of 18–29 year‑olds for Trump in 2024 than in 2020, and academic observers at Harvard and Tufts documented a rightward shift among Gen Z and younger voters even as the youngest cohort still narrowly preferred the Democratic ticket overall in many measures [2] [5] [6].
2. Middle age was decisive: 50–64 swung strongly toward Trump
Exit polling and post‑election analyses show the 50–64 cohort tilted heavily to Trump in 2024 — AARP’s summary notes 56% of voters 50–64 backed Trump, a decisive bloc that turned outcomes in several battlegrounds — and Pew reports that the share of voters aged 50 and older who favored Trump was largely similar across recent cycles, underscoring that middle‑aged voters were a stable and crucial component of his coalition [3] [4].
3. Seniors were not uniformly the bedrock they once were
While older voters remained important, several analyses suggest the simple “older = more pro‑Trump” rule weakened: PRRI’s work found seniors (65+) were significantly less likely than younger Americans to back Trump in 2024 within the white working‑class model, and some exit poll splits show the 65+ group was more divided than the 50–64 bracket, meaning Trump’s relative strength shifted down a generation in some places [7] [3].
4. Nuances by gender, race and education complicate the age story
Age shifts did not act alone: CNN and Rutgers analysis highlight that white college‑educated voters flipped from narrowly backing Trump in 2016 to favoring Harris in 2024, while men — particularly men under 50 — moved toward Trump more than women did, and Hispanic and Black younger voters showed mixed but significant movement toward the Republican ticket, all of which interacts with age to reshape the coalition [8] [4] [9].
5. Methodological caveats and competing interpretations
Different data sources rely on exit polls, AP VoteCast, national surveys and post‑election panels that vary in weighting, state coverage and turnout assumptions; Newsweek and Statista report larger gains among 18–29 year‑olds in some datasets (AP VoteCast: 47% for Trump on one measure) while Pew’s voter‑composition approach emphasizes shares of the coalition rather than raw vote swings, so claims about “surges” must be read alongside these measurement differences and turnout changes between 2016, 2020 and 2024 [2] [1] [4].
6. Bottom line: a younger, more broadly based Trump coalition in 2024 than in 2016
The balance of evidence from Pew, exit polls and academic observers points to Trump’s 2024 coalition containing a larger proportion of under‑50 and middle‑aged voters than in 2016 — a generational redistribution rather than a wholesale replacement of his older base — and while older voters remained influential, gains among younger men, Gen Z, and the 50–64 cohort were central to the changed age profile [1] [3] [5].