Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: Where in the kremlin are thetrump tapes kept?
1. Summary of the results
The question assumes the existence of "Trump tapes" in the Kremlin, but multiple credible sources indicate no concrete evidence exists to prove such tapes are real [1]. While rumors have circulated about potential compromising material from Trump's 2013 Moscow visit during the Miss Universe Pageant, the Mueller report explicitly states that no evidence has surfaced to prove these tapes exist [1].
2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints
Several important contextual elements need to be considered:
- A Russian businessman, Giorgi Rtskhiladze, texted Michael Cohen about "stopped flow of tapes from Russia," but later told prosecutors the tapes were believed to be fake [2]
- The Crocus Group lawyer dismissed the allegations as "total nonsense" [2]
- The allegations originated largely from the Steele dossier, which has been heavily criticized as:
- Politically motivated with no credible evidence [3]
- Based primarily on news reports rather than intelligence [3]
- Uncritically accepted by the FBI and media despite dubious origins [3]
3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement
The question itself contains several problematic assumptions:
- It presumes the existence of tapes that have never been proven to exist [1]
- It reflects a narrative that benefited different political groups:
- Democrats, particularly Adam Schiff, used selective leaks and unverified claims to promote this narrative [4]
- Trump supporters view the entire Russian investigation as a politically motivated "hoax" designed to delegitimize Trump's presidency [5]
- The Kremlin, through Putin's spokesman, has dismissed such allegations as "pulp fiction" [6]
The persistence of this narrative demonstrates how unverified claims can become embedded in public discourse, despite lack of concrete evidence.