Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Goal: 1,000 supporters
Loading...

What exact wording did Donald Trump use about New York City on Truth Social on November 2025?

Checked on November 17, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important info or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

Available reporting shows specific Truth Social posts from Donald Trump on and around 3–5 November 2025 that mention New York City. Key quoted lines include: “If Communist Candidate Zohran Mamdani wins the Election for Mayor of New York City, it is highly unlikely that I will be contributing Federal Funds, other than the very minimum as required, to my beloved first home,” and “I don’t want to send, as President, good money after bad” [1] [2] [3]. Other brief posts tied to the mayoral outcome included “…AND SO IT BEGINS!” and all‑caps commentary after election night [4] [5].

1. What the reporting actually quotes — the direct Truth Social wording

Multiple news outlets printed direct quotations from Trump’s Truth Social posts on the eve of and immediately after the New York mayoral election. The most consistently reported full quotation is: “If Communist Candidate Zohran Mamdani wins the Election for Mayor of New York City, it is highly unlikely that I will be contributing Federal Funds, other than the very minimum as required, to my beloved first home,” followed by “I don’t want to send, as President, good money after bad” (The Guardian and Reuters reproduced the same wording) [1] [2] [3]. Reuters also quoted an additional exhortation: “Whether you personally like Andrew Cuomo or not, you really have no choice. You must vote for him, and hope he does a fantastic job. He is capable of it, Mamdani is not!” [3].

2. Multiple outlets used the same wording — why that matters

The Guardian and Reuters (and articles derived from their copy) published identical or near‑identical blocks of quoted text from the same Truth Social posts, which suggests they relied on the same primary source copy of Trump’s posts or on one another’s reporting when transcribing quotes [1] [2] [3]. When several outlets print the same language, it strengthens confidence that the quoted wording was what appeared on Truth Social as reported; however, the outlets are themselves secondary sources and not the original Truth Social post archive [1] [3].

3. Shorter, reactive posts and post‑election tone

In addition to the funding‑threat post, reporting records shorter, reactive posts from Trump on Truth Social tied to the mayoral results: The Guardian noted an all‑caps post after election night complaining Republicans lost and linking the losses to “shutdown” and other factors, and another cryptic line quoted during Mamdani’s victory: “…AND SO IT BEGINS!” [5] [4]. Those items were reported as brief, emphatic lines rather than extended policy statements [5] [4].

4. Context and competing framings provided by outlets

News articles placed the posts in political context: Reuters emphasized the practical stakes, noting the federal government provides roughly $7.4 billion to New York City in fiscal year 2026 and that Trump had previously threatened withholding federal funds over policy disputes [3]. The Guardian framed the language as part of an effort to influence the race and urged Republicans to support Andrew Cuomo, whom Trump endorsed as the preferable option to Mamdani [1] [2]. These different emphases show both the quoted wording and why outlets treated it as politically significant [1] [3].

5. What the sources do not provide

Available sources do not publish a full archive screenshot or a direct permalink of the original Truth Social posts; they instead quote the text in their reporting [1] [2] [3]. The independent archival site Trump’s Truth claims to index Truth Social posts but the provided materials do not include an image or preserved original post to independently verify punctuation or line breaks beyond what reporters printed [6]. Therefore, if you require an image of the original post or exact formatting beyond the quoted sentences, that is not shown in the current reporting [6] [1].

6. How to interpret the wording politically and legally

Reporters presented the wording as an explicit threat to withhold federal funds if a candidate labeled “Communist” won, and connected it to broader patterns of Trump threatening funding over policy disputes [3]. Reuters quantified the federal contribution to the city to underline the leverage implied by the post [3]. The Guardian reproduced the quotes and placed them alongside Trump’s other public statements [1] [2]. Legal or constitutional analyses of whether a president may lawfully condition federal funds on a local election outcome are not provided in these articles — such analysis is not found in the current reporting [1] [3].

7. Bottom line and recommended next steps for exact verification

If you need the verbatim, character‑for‑character Truth Social post as it appeared (including line breaks, emojis, or exact punctuation), current mainstream reporting supplies quoted sentences but not a preserved screenshot or primary Truth Social permalink in these excerpts [1] [2] [3] [4]. To obtain a primary‑source capture, consult an archived Truth Social post or a screenshot from a reliable archival service; the stories cited here are faithful transcriptions according to multiple outlets but stop short of publishing the original post image in the provided extracts [1] [3].

Want to dive deeper?
What did Donald Trump post on Truth Social about New York City in November 2025 — full text and screenshots?
Did Truth Social or other platforms remove or edit Trump’s November 2025 post about New York City?
How did major news outlets report and quote Trump’s November 2025 Truth Social post about New York City?
What legal or policy responses followed Trump’s November 2025 Truth Social remarks about New York City?
How did New York City officials and residents react to Trump’s November 2025 Truth Social post?