In his 1st term, Did Trump order the USDA to destroy records of Animal abusers and puppy mills, and did Canadians work to collect records from other sources to reconstruct those records?

Checked on January 22, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

The public record shows that in early 2017 the USDA’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) removed thousands of Animal Welfare Act (AWA) and Horse Protection Act (HPA) inspection and enforcement reports from its public website — an action that occurred shortly after the Trump administration took office and that the agency attributed to “privacy concerns” [1] [2]. Reporting and advocacy groups document that animal‑welfare organizations, members of Congress and litigants pushed to recover and republish those records and that Congress ultimately compelled APHIS to restore the database; none of the provided sources, however, directly document a presidential order to “destroy” records or any Canadian-led effort to reconstruct them [3] [4] [5].

1. What happened to the USDA records and when

Multiple outlets report that APHIS removed a longstanding, searchable online database of AWA/HPA inspection and enforcement records in early February 2017, shortly after the new administration began, taking down reports that had been publicly posted for years and which documented violations at research labs, breeders, zoos and other facilities [1] [2] [6]. The agency described the move as prompted by privacy concerns and said it would review and determine which information was appropriate to repost [1] [5].

2. Was this a presidential order to “destroy” records?

The sources characterize the action as a purge or blackout of online records rather than proof that documents were physically destroyed, and they do not cite any primary document showing President Trump personally ordered destruction of USDA records [2] [1] [4]. Congressional leaders, senators and advocacy groups framed the removal as a transparency rollback and demanded restoration, but the reporting ties the action to agency-level decisions and to a transition in USDA leadership rather than to a publicly documented direct presidential command [5] [7] [8].

3. Who mobilized to recover the records and how were they restored

Animal‑welfare NGOs such as the Humane Society and ASPCA pursued FOIA requests, litigation, public campaigns and congressional pressure to force restoration; the Humane Society Legislative Fund and others recruited bipartisan lawmakers, and in December 2019 Congress included language in an appropriations act directing APHIS to reinstate the records within 60 days, after which the agency began restoring the database in early 2020 [3] [9] [4] [10]. Coverage describes this as a response to legislative compulsion and advocacy litigation rather than a private, grassroots resurrection of lost files [3] [1].

4. The politics and the alternative explanations offered

Advocates and many lawmakers presented the removal as a calculated rollback that would shield violators — including puppy‑mill operators and other repeat offenders — from public scrutiny, and they tied the agency’s move to a broader deregulatory agenda at USDA under new Trump-era appointees [3] [9] [5]. APHIS and USDA spokespeople countered that privacy concerns justified removing personally identifying information and that the agency was reviewing which records were appropriate to repost; subsequent statutory direction from Congress required full reinstatement without redactions of violator identities [2] [5] [4].

5. Missing pieces and limits of the record on Canadian involvement

The assembled reporting documents NGO FOIA suits, congressional letters and the USDA’s internal actions, but it does not provide evidence that Canadians organized a cross‑border effort to collect and reconstruct the USDA database; none of the provided sources mentions Canadian researchers, archivists, or governments doing that work, so the record here is silent on any Canadian reconstruction effort [3] [1] [4]. If Canadians did participate in reconstructing records, that activity is not documented in the sources provided.

Bottom line

The factual record in the cited reporting supports that the USDA removed public access to thousands of inspection and enforcement reports in early 2017 and that U.S. animal‑welfare groups, lawmakers and litigation compelled APHIS to restore the records under congressional direction by 2020; the sources do not substantiate a claim that President Trump personally ordered the physical destruction of USDA records, nor do they document Canadians working to reconstruct the database [1] [3] [4] [5].

Want to dive deeper?
Which U.S. NGOs and lawmakers led FOIA and legislative efforts to restore USDA animal welfare records?
What legal arguments did APHIS use to justify redacting or removing inspection reports in 2017?
Are there public archives or mirrors that preserved USDA inspection reports during the 2017–2020 blackout?