President Trump Says White House Ballroom Is a ‘Monument’ to Himself: ‘No One Else Will’ Build One

Checked on January 15, 2026
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

Executive summary

Jesse Watters, a Fox News host, told an audience that President Donald Trump said he is building the new White House ballroom “as a monument to myself — because no one else will,” a remark reported across multiple outlets and framed as both a punchline and confirmation of the presidential intent behind the project [1] [2]. The ballroom — variously described as roughly 90,000 square feet and costing between $300 million and $400 million — has prompted legal challenges, formal planning reviews and sharp debate over motive, process and precedent [3] [4] [5].

1. What was actually said and who reported it

The comment originates with Fox News host Jesse Watters recounting a private conversation in which he says Mr. Trump called the planned East Wing ballroom “a monument” and added “I’m building a monument to myself — because no one else will,” remarks Watters delivered at a Turning Point USA event and later reported by People, The Daily Beast and other outlets [1] [2] [6]. Coverage relies on Watters as the sole named source for the quote; news organizations that relayed it cited his public remarks rather than independent confirmation from the president or his spokespeople [1] [2].

2. The ballroom program: scale, cost and claimed purpose

The project has been presented by the White House as a long‑sought modernization to allow large indoor events, with plans described as about 90,000 square feet and originally estimated at roughly $300 million before reports of costs rising to around $400 million [4] [3]. Trump and his allies argue the space will spare future administrations from renting large pavilions on the South Lawn, while critics call the scale excessive — with some experts warning the new space could dwarf the Executive Mansion’s roughly 55,000 square feet — and see the project as personal aggrandizement [4] [7].

3. Process, pushback and the question of legality

The ballroom’s demolition work proceeded quickly after Trump ordered the East Wing razed, triggering preservationist lawsuits and a federal challenge demanding formal design reviews, environmental study and public comment before construction continues; the administration has responded by invoking national security and arguing the project should proceed, while courts now weigh those claims [3] [5]. Independent review bodies have been embroiled: the Commission of Fine Arts postponed a scheduled review amid concerns about member replacements, and the National Capital Planning Commission has fielded questions about scale and public visibility even as its composition shifted under this administration [5] [4].

4. Motives, messaging and political optics

Watters’ recounting — framed as a jest to a friendly crowd — reinforces a narrative critics have long advanced: that the ballroom is an expression of Trump’s personal branding and legacy‑building, comparable to other aesthetics and naming moves the president has pursued at the White House and beyond [2] [8]. The White House’s response to media questions has emphasized “beautification” paid for by private donors and framed the upgrades as beneficial to future presidents and visitors, a defense that sits uneasily with lawsuits asserting no executive can alter public property without due public process [2] [3].

5. How to evaluate the claim and what remains unconfirmed

Watters’ quote is a reported admission rather than a primary document; no contemporaneous on‑the‑record transcript or recording provided by the White House has been published to independently verify Trump’s exact words as reported by Watters, and the administration’s public statements have not directly echoed the “monument to myself” line [1] [2]. The factual landscape—scope, funding pledges, design choices, litigation filings and commission delays—is documented in official filings and reporting, but the characterization of motive rests on interpretation of public remarks, staffing choices and pattern‑reading rather than an incontrovertible presidential manifesto [3] [5] [4].

6. Bottom line

The concise answer: a trusted surrogate (Jesse Watters) publicly quoted Mr. Trump saying the ballroom is a “monument” to himself and that “no one else will” build one, and that quote has been widely reported [1] [2]; whether it is an offhand joke, a candid confession of legacy‑building intent, or political theater is contested and cannot be settled solely from the public reporting so far, which documents the project’s size, cost, legal fights and administrative maneuvers but lacks an independent transcript of the alleged remark [4] [3] [5].

Want to dive deeper?
What legal arguments is the National Trust for Historic Preservation using to try to stop the White House ballroom?
How have White House advisory commissions' compositions changed under the Trump administration and what impact has that had on approvals?
What precedent exists for presidents funding major permanent additions to the White House with private money?