Fact check: To date has Trump received any written trade agreements with other countries

1. Summary of the results

Based on the analyses provided, Trump has received at least one written trade agreement during his presidency. The White House reported a "Cooperation Agreement on Reciprocal, Fair and Balanced Trade" between the US and European Union, described as a "generational modernization of the transatlantic alliance" ^[1]. This represents a significant trade deal that directly answers the original question.

Additional evidence suggests Trump concluded trade agreements with the United Kingdom and Vietnam, though the analyses note that details of these agreements are limited and it remains unclear whether they constitute formal written trade agreements ^[2]. There is also mention of a joint statement on a framework for a US-Indonesia agreement on reciprocal trade, which could represent a step towards a written agreement ^[3].

However, the broader picture shows that Trump's trade policy focused heavily on tariffs rather than comprehensive trade agreements. Multiple sources document extensive tariff impositions on various countries and products ^{[4] [5] [3]}, suggesting a more confrontational approach to international trade relations.

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

The original question lacks important context about the nature and scope of Trump's trade strategy. While asking specifically about written agreements, it doesn't acknowledge that Trump's administration primarily pursued unilateral tariff policies rather than multilateral trade negotiations ^{[4] [5]}.

Critical assessment suggests Trump's trade agenda largely failed to deliver meaningful progress on long-standing trade issues, with other countries being "more inclined to placate the administration rather than negotiate mutually beneficial solutions" ^[6]. This perspective contrasts sharply with the White House's characterization of deals as major achievements.

The question also misses the distinction between executive orders modifying tariff rates and comprehensive bilateral trade agreements. Trump signed executive orders adjusting reciprocal tariff rates for certain countries ^[7], but these represent policy modifications rather than negotiated international agreements.

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original question appears neutral but may reflect an incomplete understanding of Trump's trade approach. By focusing solely on "written trade agreements," it potentially overlooks the administration's preference for tariff-based trade policy over traditional diplomatic negotiations.

The framing could inadvertently minimize the significance of Trump's tariff strategy, which represented a fundamental shift from previous administrations' approaches to international trade. The analyses reveal that Trump introduced extensive tariffs and threatened many more ^[4], making this the defining characteristic of his trade policy rather than formal agreements.

Additionally, the question doesn't account for the difference between preliminary frameworks and finalized agreements. While there's evidence of agreements with the EU, UK, and Vietnam, the analyses suggest varying degrees of completion and implementation, which the original question doesn't distinguish.