Who sits on Turning Point USA's advisory council in 2025 and which institutions or industries do they represent?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
Turning Point USA’s publicly listed Advisory Council in 2025 is a heterogeneous roster of donors, faith leaders, financiers, and conservative activists whose names appear on TPUSA’s governance pages and press materials; examples cited in reporting include Bishop Aubrey Shines, Allie Hanley, Stacey Feinberg and other longtime conservative donors and operatives [1] [2] [3] [4]. Reporting and TPUSA’s own materials indicate the council draws from the oil and energy sector, faith communities, finance and hedge‑fund circles, and conservative policy and media networks, though TPUSA’s site remains the primary source for a full roster and institutional affiliations [1] [5] [4].
1. Who sits on Turning Point USA’s Advisory Council in 2025 — named examples from primary sources
Turning Point USA’s governance page lists an Advisory Council that includes names such as Adam Brandon, Al and Lisa Hartman, Alfredo J. Molina, Allie Hanley, Barry Russell, Bill Scrogins, Bishop Aubrey Shines, Blake Saunders, Bob McEwen, Cameron Powell, Craig Jensen, Darren Blanton, David Blumberg and David Duval among others, reflecting TPUSA’s own published roster [1]. TPUSA issued a press release and website announcement in April 2025 formally naming Bishop Aubrey Shines as a new advisory‑council member, confirming faith‑leader representation in the council [2] [3]. External reporting flags additional advisory council figures tied to conservative networks—DeSmog and SourceWatch cite Ginni Thomas and members of donor families such as the Hanleys as long‑standing advisory‑council participants referenced in TPUSA materials [5] [6]. Project 2025 / GPAHE reporting further identifies Stacey Feinberg as an advisory‑council member and connects her to hedge‑fund operations, illustrating that financiers appear among TPUSA’s advisers [4].
2. Which institutions or industries they represent — donor families, energy, finance, faith, and conservative media/policy
The council’s composition, as described in TPUSA documents and investigative reporting, spans several identifiable sectors: donor families with energy ties (Allie Hanley, linked to Hanley Petroleum in reporting), faith leaders (Bishop Aubrey Shines via TPUSA announcements), financiers and asset managers (Stacey Feinberg, tied to JLF Asset Management in GPAHE reporting), and a cluster of conservative media and policy operatives who move between nonprofits, campaigns and advocacy networks (TPUSA governance and external trackers) [1] [3] [4] [5]. DeSmog’s reporting emphasizes that TPUSA advisory members include wealthy donor families and individuals who have provided funding or access to political networks, and that the Hanley family specifically has oil‑industry connections [5]. TPUSA’s own “Team” and governance pages underline involvement by professionals from finance, philanthropy and civic organizations among the broader leadership and advisory lists [7] [1].
3. Patterns, networks and contested interpretations about influence and political coordination
Multiple outlets and watchdogs interpret the Advisory Council not merely as ceremonial but as an axis tying TPUSA to conservative donor networks, the oil industry, hedge funds and Project 2025‑linked policy actors; GPAHE and DeSmog document advisory‑council members who also appear in Project 2025 mapping or donor histories, and they raise concerns about coordination with political campaigns and policy initiatives [4] [5]. SourceWatch and investigative pieces cited by DeSmog have previously alleged that TPUSA’s advisory relationships overlap with campaign activity and donor influence, a point TPUSA’s own materials do not directly contest while presenting the council as a mix of supporters and subject‑matter advisers [6] [5]. TPUSA’s public statements emphasize outreach, campus organizing and ideological education rather than explicit electoral coordination, but external reporting frames the advisory list as part of broader conservative infrastructure [7] [5].
4. Limitations, gaps and where to look next
TPUSA’s governance page and press announcements supply the primary, authoritative list of advisory‑council names, but public reporting varies in which individuals and affiliations it highlights and investigative outlets add contextual links to industry and political networks [1] [2] [5] [4]. This analysis relies on those sources; a complete, current roster with full professional biographies is best obtained directly from TPUSA’s governance page and individual disclosures because outside reporting selectively emphasizes figures with notable public ties to energy, finance, faith or Project 2025 networks [1] [5] [4]. Where reporting alleges political coordination or donor influence, those assertions are made by watchdogs and investigators; TPUSA’s official pages frame the council as advisory and supportive of the organization’s mission [5] [7].