Which Turning Point USA affiliates are registered as PACs or Super PACs and what activities do they fund?

1. What the filings identify: named Turning Point committees and their legal status

OpenSecrets lists Turning Point PAC and classifies it as a “Carey committee,” meaning a hybrid PAC/super PAC structure that can both contribute directly to candidates and make independent expenditures; the same database also identifies “Turning Point America” as a super PAC ^{[1] [2]}. OpenSecrets’ dedicated pages for Turning Point PAC include summary pages, donor lists and records of independent expenditures and candidate contributions consistent with those classifications ^{[5] [3]}.

2. What activities these PACs fund — direct contributions and outside spending

Turning Point PAC’s OpenSecrets profiles show activity in two buckets: contributions to federal candidates and independent expenditures (outside spending) such as ads and get‑out‑the‑vote communications; OpenSecrets maintains separate pages detailing candidate recipients and independent expenditure records ^{[5] [3]}. OpenSecrets’ outside‑spending tracking for Turning Point also treats the group as engaging in federal election outside spending, consistent with hybrid/super PAC activity ^{[6] [3]}.

3. Recent, high‑profile political uses: funding primaries and coordinated multi‑PAC efforts

Contemporary reporting cited in aggregated sources describes Turning Point Action (the movement’s 501(c) affiliate) coordinating with aligned PACs in a planned “eight‑figure” spending drive to back primary challengers against Republican incumbents who resisted redistricting — a strategy Turning Point’s spokesperson Andrew Kolvet confirmed to Politico and was summarized in multiple outlets ^{[4] [7]}. That account frames Turning Point‑linked PACs’ activity as targeting intra‑party opponents through substantial independent expenditures and coordinated funding.

4. Organizational ecosystem: how TPUSA, TPAction and PACs fit together

Turning Point’s public sites distinguish several entities: TPUSA (501(c) student/advocacy arm), Turning Point Action (TPAction, a 501(c) stated to “accelerat[e] freedom through conservative action”), and separate political committees tracked by OpenSecrets ^{[8] [9]}. OpenSecrets’ outside‑spending pages describe the overall operation as operating like a Carey committee and list affiliates and expenditures, signaling that political spending is routed through specialized committees while advocacy and organizing occur under nonprofit arms ^{[6] [3]}.

5. What the records and reporting do not say (limits of available sources)

Available sources do not offer a complete, line‑by‑line accounting of every state or local expenditure by each Turning Point affiliate; OpenSecrets provides federal filings, donor summaries and expenditure tallies but state‑level or in‑kind coordination details are not presented in the provided material ^{[5] [6]}. Likewise, while news reports describe an “eight‑figure” plan with partner PACs, available clips in the results summarize the pledge but do not disclose the final spend total or itemized ad buys in the links supplied ^{[4] [7]}.

6. Competing framings and incentives to note

OpenSecrets frames these committees quantitatively — legal status, receipts, independent expenditures — while Turning Point’s own sites emphasize mission and organizing ^{[8] [10]}. Political outlets reporting the “eight‑figure” targeting emphasize the group’s role in intra‑party policing and electioneering; allied statements to Politico present the spending as defending a presidential agenda, revealing an explicit political aim and incentive for aggressive primary spending ^{[4] [7]}. Readers should note advocacy arms have a separate public posture (education/organizing) from the PACs that run explicit electoral campaigns ^{[8] [9]}.

7. Bottom line and next steps for verification

Public, citable records show Turning Point‑linked committees operate as at least one hybrid PAC/super PAC (“Turning Point PAC”) and a super PAC (“Turning Point America”), and those committees make both contributions to candidates and independent expenditures; reporting connects those PACs and 501(c) affiliates to multi‑PAC efforts to fund primary challengers ^{[1] [2] [5] [3] [4]}. For itemized spending, donor identities beyond what OpenSecrets summarizes, or confirmation of final outlays in the “eight‑figure” campaign, consult the full FEC filings and the detailed OpenSecrets expenditure/donor pages referenced above ^{[5] [3] [6]}.