What is the relationship between Turning Point USA and black conservative groups?

Checked on September 28, 2025
Disclaimer: Factually can make mistakes. Please verify important information or breaking news. Learn more.

This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.

Was this fact-check helpful?

1. Summary of the results

Based on the available analyses, Turning Point USA's relationship with black conservative groups appears to be complex and multifaceted, involving both supportive community-building efforts and controversial targeting practices.

The most significant finding reveals that Charlie Kirk and Turning Point USA played a crucial role in creating a community for young Black conservatives [1]. This community-building effort provided Black conservatives with a sense of belonging and opportunities for growth, helping to broaden the GOP's reach among Black voters. The impact was measurable: Donald Trump's support among Black voters increased from 8% in 2020 to 15% in 2024, which sources partially attribute to Kirk's efforts [1].

Individual Black conservative figures have directly benefited from Turning Point USA's platform. Rob Smith, a Black gay conservative commentator, specifically credits Charlie Kirk and Turning Point USA for his career development [2]. This suggests that the organization has served as a launching pad for Black conservative voices in media and politics.

However, the relationship is complicated by Turning Point USA's Professor Watchlist initiative, which has specifically targeted Black professors who speak out on issues related to race and inclusion [3]. This watchlist, launched in 2016, monitors and exposes perceived ideological opponents, creating what sources describe as a climate of fear and intimidation on college campuses [3]. Black professors on this list have faced harassment and threats both on and off campus [3].

The targeting extends beyond formal groups to individuals. Preston Mitchum, a Black, queer man and former Georgetown Law adjunct professor, was targeted by the Professor Watchlist and received death threats [4]. This demonstrates how the organization's activities can negatively impact Black academics and intellectuals who don't align with their ideology.

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

The analyses reveal several critical gaps in understanding the full scope of this relationship. None of the sources provide comprehensive information about formal partnerships or collaborations between Turning Point USA and established black conservative organizations. While individual relationships are documented, the institutional connections remain unclear.

Critics argue that Kirk's approach was divisive and problematic. Sources note that Kirk's views played on racial archetypes and stereotypes [1], suggesting that his community-building efforts may have come at the cost of perpetuating harmful racial narratives. Additionally, Kirk made comments on race and crime that sparked backlash from liberal groups [5], indicating controversy around his racial messaging.

The Professor Watchlist has inspired other groups and individuals to target and harass professors, including right-wing influencers and conservative parent groups [4]. This suggests that Turning Point USA's influence extends beyond direct relationships with Black conservative groups to creating a broader climate of intolerance and censorship that affects Black academics and intellectuals.

The organization's expansion efforts are also noteworthy. Oklahoma State Superintendent Ryan Walters planned to establish Turning Point USA chapters in every high school in the state [6], and the organization has partnered with over 40 organizations to promote patriotism in schools [7]. However, it's unclear how these expansion efforts specifically relate to or impact Black conservative groups.

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original question itself doesn't contain explicit misinformation, but it may oversimplify a complex and contradictory relationship. By asking about "the relationship" in singular terms, it implies there's one coherent dynamic, when the evidence suggests multiple, sometimes conflicting relationships exist simultaneously.

The question also fails to acknowledge the controversial aspects of Turning Point USA's activities that directly impact Black individuals and communities. The Professor Watchlist's targeting of Black academics represents a significant part of the organization's relationship with Black voices that isn't captured in a simple question about "black conservative groups."

Furthermore, the framing might inadvertently suggest that all Black conservatives have a uniform relationship with Turning Point USA, when the evidence shows that while some individuals like Rob Smith have benefited greatly, others like Preston Mitchum have been targeted and harassed. The relationship varies significantly depending on whether Black conservatives align with or challenge Turning Point USA's specific ideological positions.

The question also doesn't account for the temporal aspect - Kirk's death appears to have had significant implications for this community [1], suggesting that the relationship has evolved and may continue to change over time.

Want to dive deeper?
What is the mission of Turning Point USA and its impact on black conservatives?
How does Turning Point USA engage with black conservative groups on college campuses?
What are the criticisms of Turning Point USA's approach to diversity and inclusion?
Which black conservative leaders have spoken at Turning Point USA events?
How does Turning Point USA's relationship with black conservative groups compare to other conservative organizations?