Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
What Turning Point USA chapters were suspended or closed for harassment and when?
Executive Summary
Turning Point USA (TPUSA) has been tied to multiple harassment controversies, but the available records in the provided sources do not produce a definitive, dated list of TPUSA chapters that were formally suspended or closed for harassment. Reporting documents specific harassment incidents involving TPUSA staff or members at Arizona State University and wider allegations of internal racist behavior, while other pieces describe the organization's controversial Professor Watchlist and campus conflicts; none of the supplied sources state that particular local chapters were officially suspended or shuttered for harassment on specific dates [1] [2] [3] [4] [5].
1. What people claim: Protests, watchlists and confrontations that look like harassment
The discourse around TPUSA in these documents centers on activities that critics and some institutions describe as harassment: the Professor Watchlist produced by TPUSA led to targeted online harassment of faculty members, generating complaints from affected professors and commentators about intimidation and threats to academic freedom [3] [6]. Separate coverage highlights confrontations between TPUSA-affiliated individuals and university personnel, including an incident at Arizona State University where employees admitted guilt in a confrontation with a queer instructor, and criminal charges were filed in related episodes of alleged assault and harassment [1] [2]. These pieces establish a pattern of contested behavior tied to TPUSA actors, but they stop short of documenting university-mandated chapter suspensions or closures explicitly tied to harassment allegations [3] [1].
2. What institutions reported: disciplinary actions, not always chapter closures
University and law-enforcement records described in the sources document disciplinary or legal responses to specific incidents, such as student or staff discipline and criminal charges following confrontations, rather than a public roll of TPUSA chapter suspensions or campus bans [2] [7]. The TPUSA chapter handbook and organizational materials stress codes of conduct and chapter obligations, suggesting the group’s national leadership expects local compliance; these internal rules appear designed to limit incidents that could trigger sanctioning, but the handbook does not provide a public list of chapters closed due to harassment [8]. Reporting on internal allegations of racial bias and offensive conduct within TPUSA leadership provides context on the organization’s culture and complaints but similarly lacks direct evidence of formal chapter-level suspensions or shutdowns for harassment [5].
3. Where concrete cases exist: Arizona State and high-profile confrontations
The most concrete, date-stamped incidents in the supplied sources involve Arizona State University in late 2023 and early 2024, where TPUSA-affiliated individuals faced charges and admitted guilt in confrontations with faculty, prompting condemnations from university leadership and legal proceedings; those items show individual accountability and institutional concern but do not document a university suspension or closure of an entire TPUSA chapter [2] [1]. Coverage of unrest around new TPUSA chapters, such as the Royal Oak High School case in 2025, highlights local community backlash, protests, and administrative monitoring, indicating contentious campus responses without accompanying reports that the chapter was formally closed for harassment [9]. These examples illustrate how incidents can provoke institutional scrutiny without automatically producing chapter suspensions captured in the sourced reporting.
4. Gaps in the record: what the sources do not show and why it matters
None of the provided analyses or documents supply a comprehensive or dated list of TPUSA chapters that were suspended or closed expressly for harassment. The materials include allegations, internal complaints, disciplinary actions against individuals, and descriptions of reputational controversies—but they lack archival evidence of formal chapter suspensions or shutdown orders tied to harassment claims [3] [5] [2]. That absence could reflect incomplete reporting, different institutional responses (e.g., private settlements, internal discipline), or instances where chapters disbanded voluntarily under pressure rather than being publicly suspended. The distinction matters because it changes how accountability is recorded: criminal charges and university discipline against individuals are documented, while organizational-level sanctions are less visible in the provided sources.
5. Bottom line and where to look next for dates and chapter names
To answer the original question definitively—listing which TPUSA chapters were suspended or closed for harassment and when—requires targeted searches of university sanction records, local campus news archives, or TPUSA’s internal communications and national chapter roster over time. The supplied sources point to specific incidents and broader patterns of controversy (Professor Watchlist, workplace bias allegations, ASU confrontations, and local campus strife) but do not contain the explicit, dated chapter suspension or closure records requested [3] [4] [5] [1]. For a verifiable timeline, consult campus judicial outcomes and public statements from university administrations or TPUSA between 2016–2025, as those records would provide the authoritative chapter-level action and dates missing from the current set of sources.