How many Turning Point USA chapters are there in the state of Ohio?

1. Summary of the results

Based on the available analyses, none of the sources provide a specific number of Turning Point USA chapters in the state of Ohio. The search results reveal a significant gap in publicly available information regarding state-level chapter counts for this conservative student organization.

The analyses do confirm that Turning Point USA has an established presence in Ohio, with documented chapters at major universities including Miami University and the University of Cincinnati ^{[1] [2] [3]}. However, these sources focus on individual institutional controversies rather than providing comprehensive state-level data.

What emerges from the analyses is information about Turning Point USA's broader organizational scope. The organization maintains a presence on more than 3,500 campuses nationwide ^[1], with approximately 900 official college chapters and around 1,200 high school chapters across the country ^[4]. Additionally, the organization operates more than 1,000 chapters in high schools nationally ^[5].

Recent organizational developments appear to have significantly impacted chapter formation. Following Charlie Kirk's death, Turning Point USA has been "deluged with requests to start new campus chapters" ^[3] and has received over 32,000 inquiries to start new campus chapters in just 48 hours ^[4]. This surge in interest suggests the organization's influence and reach may be expanding rapidly.

The University of Cincinnati chapter specifically generated controversy, with rumors circulating that the university had shut down its Turning Point USA chapter, though these rumors were later addressed and clarified by the institution ^{[2] [3]}.

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

The analyses reveal several critical gaps in available information that prevent a complete answer to the original question. No source provides state-level breakdowns of chapter numbers, suggesting this information may not be publicly disclosed by Turning Point USA or may require direct contact with the organization.

The focus on controversy rather than organizational structure in the available sources indicates potential media bias toward conflict-driven narratives. Sources concentrate on disputes at the University of Cincinnati rather than providing comprehensive organizational data ^{[2] [3]}. This suggests that routine organizational information may be less newsworthy than controversial incidents.

Alternative data sources that might provide more complete information are notably absent from the analyses. Official Turning Point USA websites, state education department records, or academic freedom organizations might maintain more comprehensive chapter listings, but these sources were not accessed in the available analyses.

The timing of information also presents challenges. With over 32,000 recent inquiries for new chapters ^[4], any current count would likely be outdated quickly, suggesting the question itself may be targeting a moving target.

Geographic expansion patterns mentioned in the analyses, such as Oklahoma's plan to establish chapters in every high school ^[6], indicate that state-level strategies vary significantly, making Ohio's specific situation potentially unique and requiring targeted research.

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original question itself does not contain explicit misinformation, as it simply asks for factual information about chapter numbers. However, the question assumes that such information is readily available and publicly accessible, which the analyses demonstrate is not the case.

The question's framing suggests an expectation of precise, current data that may not exist in public records. This could reflect a misunderstanding of how political organizations like Turning Point USA report their organizational structure, as they may not be required to disclose detailed geographic breakdowns of their chapters.

Implicit assumptions in the question include the expectation that chapters are formally registered and counted in a way that allows for state-level enumeration. The analyses suggest that chapter formation may be more fluid and dynamic than this assumption implies, particularly given the recent surge in formation requests ^[4].

The question also assumes static organizational structure, when the evidence suggests rapid growth and change following recent events. With thousands of new chapter inquiries, any answer provided might be immediately outdated.

No apparent political bias exists in the question itself, though the lack of available data might reflect organizational transparency issues or media coverage patterns that prioritize controversy over basic organizational information.