Has Turning Point USA issued any public statement regarding Dan Flood’s role or any staff directory removals in 2025?

1. What the reporting actually documents about Dan Flood’s association with TPUSA

Multiple independent online directories and profile-aggregation sites list Dan (Daniel) Flood as a Turning Point USA executive—variously described as Chief Asset Management Officer, Asset Management Chief & Officer, or head of risk/executive protection—indicating a consistent external attribution of a security/asset role within TPUSA ^{[1] [2] [3] [5]}.

2. Primary-source or institutional confirmation in the supplied material

The only TPUSA-hosted item in the dataset is the organization’s team page snapshot, which is dated April 4, 2025, but the excerpts returned do not include Flood’s name or a contemporaneous TPUSA statement about him; that TPUSA page in this set instead contains leadership references unrelated to Flood, and does not serve as an explicit confirmation or denial of his position ^[6].

3. Evidence that a staff page was noticed missing or removed

Social posts captured in the results record observers saying that Dan Flood’s TPUSA profile page “is no longer on their website,” and other social threads identify Flood as the man seen protecting Charlie Kirk in event photos while noting the apparent absence of his profile on tpusa.com ^{[4] [7] [8]}. Those posts document public attention to an apparent removal or disappearance, but they are user‑generated claims rather than organizational statements ^[4].

4. Reporting that corroborates Flood’s security role at or around 2025

A later news account—The Salt Lake Tribune piece included in the sources—reports that Flood “was directly assigned by Kirk’s organization, Turning Point USA, to protect him,” describing Flood as part of Kirk’s protective detail at the time of the fatal shooting in September 2025, which supports third‑party descriptions of Flood’s security responsibilities ^[9].

5. Does TPUSA appear to have issued any formal public statement about his role or directory changes in 2025?

No explicit TPUSA public statement about Flood’s role or explaining any directory removals appears in the provided material; the dataset contains directory listings and social posts noting a missing page but no press release, organizational statement, or quoted TPUSA spokesperson addressing those specific issues ^{[1] [2] [4] [3]}.

6. Alternative explanations, possible agendas, and gaps in the record

The record supports two plausible, alternate lines: one, Flood was publicly affiliated with TPUSA through third‑party profiles and on‑the‑ground reporting ^{[1] [2] [9]}; two, social media users observed a missing page and inferred a removal ^[4]. Absent an organizational statement, motives for any removal—routine website housekeeping, security/privacy choices, or intentional distancing—cannot be determined from these sources alone; social posts may reflect partisan amplification or rumor, and directory aggregators can lag or retain outdated data, so both omission and persistence of entries have potential biases ^{[4] [3]}.

7. Bottom line and what remains unverified

Based on the supplied reporting, Turning Point USA has not issued a verifiable, on‑the‑record public statement in 2025 about Dan Flood’s role or about removing his staff page; available evidence is limited to third‑party profiles that list him as a TPUSA security/asset official and social posts noting an apparently missing TPUSA page, while a later news story corroborates his assignment to Charlie Kirk’s protection team—none of which substitute for an organizational release explaining a directory change ^{[1] [2] [4] [9]}.