Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Time left: ...
Loading...Goal: $500

Fact check: Labour Rise of national insurance payments

Checked on May 29, 2025

1. Summary of the results

Labour has implemented a significant rise in National Insurance contributions, specifically:

  • Employer NI rates increased from 13.8% to 15% [1]
  • The threshold for payments reduced from £9,100 to £5,000 per year [1]
  • The changes will take effect from April 6, 2025 [2]
  • The rise is projected to generate £25.7 billion annually by 2029/30 [3]

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

*Economic Impact:

  • The Office for Budget Responsibility estimates:
  • 2% increase to employers' payroll costs [2]
  • 60% of costs will be passed to workers and consumers through lower wages and higher prices [2]
  • 40% will be absorbed by businesses as reduced profits [2]
  • 76% of the employers' NICs increase will ultimately be passed on to employees through lower wages [4]

Business Opposition:

  • Key business leaders have voiced strong concerns:
  • Rain Newton-Smith (CBI) and Kate Nicholls (UK Hospitality) warn it could "hobble" economic growth [5]
  • Particularly concerning for sectors with high staffing costs, like hospitality [5]
  • Small businesses are expected to be disproportionately affected compared to larger corporations [1]

**3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement**

Political Context:

  • There's controversy over Labour's manifesto pledge:
  • Labour claimed their promise not to increase National Insurance only applied to "working people," not employers [3]
  • The manifesto commitment was not clearly defined, leading to disputes [4]

Government Positioning:*

  • Chancellor Rachel Reeves has framed this as a "difficult" but necessary choice to fund public services [1]
  • The Institute for Fiscal Studies suggests a 1% increase could raise £8.5bn annually, though with complex economic consequences [5]

This situation demonstrates how political promises and economic policies often involve nuanced interpretations and complex trade-offs between government revenue, business interests, and worker welfare.

Want to dive deeper?
Jamal Roberts gave away his winnings to an elementary school.
Did a theater ceiling really collapse in the filming of the latest Final Destination?
Is Rachel Zegler suing South Park?