Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Fact check: What are the eligibility requirements for undocumented immigrants to receive a social security number in 2025?
Executive Summary
Undocumented immigrants are generally not eligible for a Social Security number (SSN) or Social Security benefits under existing federal law; recent 2025 reporting shows the federal government has taken administrative steps aimed at restricting benefit access and identifying noncitizens in benefit systems. Coverage of these changes includes claims that the Social Security Administration (SSA) has flagged thousands of immigrants as deceased and that the White House issued a memorandum to block benefit access, generating controversy over legal eligibility, enforcement mechanisms, and political motive [1] [2].
1. A startling administrative move: thousands flagged as ‘deceased’ — what happened and why it matters
Reporting in April 2025 described the SSA marking over 6,000 noncitizens as "deceased" in agency records, a change that effectively severs or complicates access to benefits and employment verification tied to SSNs, according to investigative coverage [1]. This administrative action is presented as part of a broader enforcement push; the practical effect is to prevent benefit payments and to create discrepancies in wage and identity records that can have cascading consequences for immigrants who have been working or paying taxes. The reporting highlights the operational leverage the SSA holds via its databases, and how changes to a status flag can have outsized real-world impacts [1].
2. White House memorandum: policy intent versus statutory reality
President Trump’s April 2025 memorandum has been reported as directing a bar on undocumented immigrants receiving Social Security benefits, framed by the administration as aligning benefits with statutory eligibility and targeting misuse of SSNs in employment [2]. Legally, current federal statute generally ties benefit eligibility to lawful presence or work-authorization, so the administration frames the memorandum as enforcement of existing law. Critics and advocates interpret the memorandum differently: proponents call it closing loopholes where undocumented workers may have used borrowed or fraudulent SSNs to earn credits, while opponents view it as a politically driven expansion of enforcement with significant collateral damage for mixed-status families and taxpaying workers [2].
3. Conflicting narratives: enforcement action or targeted purge?
Two narratives emerge from coverage: one emphasizes lawful enforcement to stop benefit receipt by those not statutorily entitled, while the other portrays the actions as a targeted campaign to force immigrants out by incapacitating their legal and financial standing [1]. The reports alleging thousands were marked as dead frame the action as part of a crackdown, whereas administration statements cited in coverage frame the memorandum and database actions as necessary to stop benefit misuse. Both narratives rely on different readings of administrative authority and the SSA’s role; the tension underscores how procedural changes can be read as policy substance depending on the observer’s viewpoint [2].
4. What the provided sources do — and do not — establish about SSN issuance eligibility
The materials supplied focus primarily on benefit eligibility and administrative actions, not on the detailed SSN issuance process for undocumented immigrants. The sources collectively indicate that undocumented immigrants are not eligible for Social Security benefits and that the government is moving to prevent benefit payments to those lacking lawful status, but they do not identify an expanded legal pathway in 2025 for undocumented persons to obtain SSNs [2]. The gap in the reporting is important: issuance of an SSN historically requires proof of lawful presence or an employment-authorizing status, and the supplied analyses stop short of documenting any statutory change to that baseline [3] [4].
5. Evidence quality and source limitations — what to watch for in follow-up reporting
The investigative reports provide impactful anecdotes about flagged records and an administration memorandum, but the supplied analyses reveal reliance on a small set of contemporaneous articles and lack documents such as the text of the memorandum or SSA procedural manuals in 2025. The sources are recent (April–June 2025) and repeated across outlets, but they may reflect editorial framing and selective detail. Observers should look for primary documents — the actual memorandum language, SSA policy memos, and data on the number and categories of SSNs issued or invalidated — to verify claims and understand whether changes are administrative, regulatory, or statutory [1] [2].
6. Policy implications and affected populations: beyond headlines
If the reported actions persist, the practical consequences extend beyond benefit checks to employment verification, tax records, and access to services dependent on SSN validity. The affected populations include undocumented workers who have entered earnings under borrowed or false SSNs, mixed-status families, and lawful residents whose records intersect with SSA database changes. The supplied coverage raises questions about due process, avenues for error correction, and potential hardship for people who have been filing taxes or working, underscoring that administrative flags can create socio-economic disruption even where the stated aim is eligibility enforcement [1].
7. Political context and competing agendas visible in reporting
The juxtaposition of administrative steps and presidential memorandum reflects a politically charged environment: the administration frames actions as rule enforcement to protect program integrity, while critics frame them as politically motivated tactics targeting immigrants ahead of electoral cycles. The coverage shows both enforcement-focused and civil-rights-focused agendas, and readers should expect future reporting to continue to parse motive, legal authority, and human impact as more documents and data emerge [2].
8. Bottom line and recommended follow-up sources to resolve outstanding questions
Based on the provided materials, undocumented immigrants remain broadly ineligible for SSNs and Social Security benefits, and the 2025 coverage documents intensified administrative enforcement including a memorandum and record interventions; however, the supplied analyses do not demonstrate a new lawful pathway for SSN issuance to undocumented persons. To reach firmer conclusions, obtain the full text of the April 2025 memorandum, SSA policy guidance on SSN issuance and record flags, and official counts of affected records and appeals — these primary documents would clarify scope, legal basis, and remedies for those impacted [2] [1].