Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
Are bills being submitted in the United States to instate Islam as the religion of the country?
Executive Summary
There is no evidence that bills are being submitted in the United States to make Islam the official national religion; instead, contemporary legislative activity cited in the supplied materials moves in the opposite direction—either protecting Muslim individuals from discriminatory policies or explicitly resisting Islamic law in U.S. courts. The historical and constitutional context confirms that the First Amendment and the Establishment Clause bar Congress from designating any religion as the state religion, and recent bills discussed in the sources focus on anti-discrimination or prohibiting Sharia, not on establishing Islam as official [1] [2] [3].
1. How the Constitution and Founders Shut Down State Religion Theories
The U.S. Constitution’s Establishment Clause and the First Amendment prevent Congress from establishing a national religion, a principle the Founding Fathers explicitly supported in their writings and policy choices; scholars and institutional histories underline that the framers intended religious freedom for all faiths, including Muslims, as part of that constitutional structure [4] [1]. The sources show historians and legal scholars noting early American engagement with Islam primarily as an example that religious liberty must be protected rather than a prompt to adopt any single creed; this constitutional baseline makes any credible legislative effort to instate Christianity or Islam as the national religion functionally impossible under current law without an extraordinary constitutional amendment. This legal architecture is the first and most decisive reason why claims of bills to make Islam the state religion lack a factual basis [1].
2. What recent bills actually do: protection and prohibition, not establishment
Contemporary legislative initiatives reflected in the provided analyses show two distinct patterns: efforts to protect Muslim individuals and anti-Sharia proposals that explicitly target Islamic law’s influence. Senators and Representatives reintroduced the NO BAN Act to prevent religiously targeted travel restrictions and to guard against future “Muslim bans,” aiming to embed non-discrimination into immigration policy; the NO BAN Act’s sponsors framed it as protection against religious discrimination, not as a move to elevate any religion to official status [2] [5]. Conversely, Republican proposals labeled as “No Shari’a” bills seek to ban enforcement of foreign or religious laws in U.S. courts, a response rooted in concerns about legal pluralism and the primacy of constitutional law. Both tracks demonstrate legislative activity oriented toward rights and limits, not toward establishing Islam as a national religion [3] [2].
3. Why viral claims of 'Islam being installed' miss the legislative record
The materials provided consistently found no evidence supporting the claim that any bill intends to make Islam the U.S. national religion; instead, the record reveals bills that either strengthen religious liberty protections for Muslims or pursue measures to prevent religious laws from supplanting civil law. Fact-checks and analyses across the supplied documents reached the same conclusion: legislative text and press releases show no attempt to institute Islam as state religion, and the constitutional prohibition makes such a move legally implausible absent an amendment [6] [1] [2]. The discrepancy arises when rhetorical political narratives conflate protection of religious freedom with endorsement, or when opposition frames anti-discrimination bills as favoritism, a framing not supported by legislative language or constitutional rules [2].
4. Different perspectives in play: protection advocates vs. restriction proponents
The sources illustrate two competing political agendas shaping public discourse: civil libertarians and Democratic lawmakers emphasize anti-discrimination and the need to prevent state-sanctioned targeting of Muslims, backing measures like the NO BAN Act to limit religious profiling; their publicly stated aim is equal protection under immigration and administrative policies [2] [5]. On the other side, some Republican lawmakers champion anti-Sharia legislation as a safeguard for constitutional supremacy and cultural norms, arguing that foreign religious laws should not influence American jurisprudence; these sponsors present their bills as protective of American law, not as anti-Muslim per se [3]. Both sides use constitutional language for different ends, but neither side’s proposed legislation seeks to declare Islam the state religion [3] [2].
5. Closing assessment and what’s missing from the claim
Given the consistent absence of supporting legislative texts or credible authoritative reporting in these sources, the claim that bills are being submitted to make Islam the United States’ official religion is false. The supplied analyses repeatedly find no evidence of such bills and instead document protective measures and anti-Sharia proposals in recent years, with primary sources dating from scholarly retrospectives to 2024–2025 legislative actions [4] [1] [3] [2]. The major omitted consideration in viral claims is the constitutional barrier: designating a state religion would require overriding the First Amendment, a point highlighted across historical and legal reviews and absent from the rhetoric of cited bills [1].