Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
What are the current border crossing statistics for 2025?
Executive summary
U.S. government reporting and news coverage for 2025 show historically low land-border encounters and USBP apprehensions: CBP reported southwest border apprehensions of about 8,347 in February 2025 and 7,181 in March 2025, while agency statements described record-low nationwide monthly totals near 8,000 Border Patrol apprehensions and overall encounters as low as ~25,000–25,243 in June 2025 [1] [2] [3] [4]. Independent compilations (BTS) cover legal port-of-entry crossings (cars, trucks, pedestrians) separately from CBP encounter metrics and remain the authoritative source for commercial and passenger inbound counts [5] [6].
1. What CBP means by “encounters” and how that shapes 2025 statistics
CBP’s public dashboards and releases define “encounters” to include several distinct categories: U.S. Border Patrol (USBP) Title 8 apprehensions between ports of entry, Office of Field Operations (OFO) Title 8 inadmissibles at ports of entry, and Title 42 expulsions — and those data are extracted from live CBP systems and are subject to revision [7]. This definitional mix means headline figures reported as “encounters” are an operational aggregate, not a simple count of unique individuals attempting unlawful entry [7].
2. Monthly figures and the “historic lows” narrative
CBP’s monthly media releases frame 2025 as producing record-low enforcement metrics. Examples cited by CBP include February 2025 southwest apprehensions of 8,347 and March 2025 southwest apprehensions of 7,181, with March described as “the lowest southwest border crossings in history” and a nationwide USBP daily average dropping to about 264 in March [1] [2]. CBP and DHS later reported June 2025 nationwide USBP apprehensions around 8,024–8,039 and total nationwide encounters near 25,243, language DHS used to call the “most secure border in American history” [3] [4].
3. What the numbers don’t automatically tell you
CBP and DHS statements interpret the drop as evidence of improved operational control and enforcement success, noting fewer releases and faster removals [8] [9]. However, available sources do not provide independent analysis here on causes or on how many unique people those encounter counts represent versus repeat attempts; CBP itself warns that monthly statistics are subject to change due to corrections or definitional updates [7]. External reporting (Axios) corroborated specific monthly apprehension counts (e.g., ~8,300 in February) but framed the trend in broader political and policy context, noting prior declines tied to Mexican enforcement and prior administrations’ policy shifts [10].
4. Port-of-entry traffic and separate BTS metrics
Border activity at official ports of entry is tracked separately by the Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS), which reports volumes for trucks, personal vehicles, buses, and pedestrians entering the United States; these are not the same as CBP’s “encounter” counts and reflect legal inbound crossings [5] [6]. BTS releases for 2025–2025 period-level reporting show, for example, large truck and vehicle flows by port and monthly summaries released on schedule; they are the authoritative series for commercial and passenger throughput [5] [11].
5. Media and government framing: competing perspectives
CBP and DHS releases explicitly credit recent executive actions and enforcement changes for the dramatic declines — calling them “historic” or “most secure” and pointing to eliminated catch-and-release and higher repatriations [8] [9] [4]. Independent outlets like Axios reported the same numeric trends but placed them in a longer arc of migration policy shifts and cross-border enforcement by Mexico, suggesting multiple drivers beyond a single policy change [10]. Readers should note that CBP and DHS framing serves institutional and political aims (to demonstrate policy effectiveness), while outside reporting emphasizes context and multiple causal factors [10].
6. Caveats, revisions, and data types to watch
CBP warns that encounter statistics are provisional and can change; finalized monthly releases exist but definitions and system corrections can alter later totals [7] [3]. BTS annual and monthly releases use different inputs and should be consulted for port-of-entry traffic, while CBP encounter dashboards remain the source for interdiction/apprehension data [7] [5]. The available results here do not discuss “gotaways” in 2025 with full detail beyond a DHS claim that estimated gotaways fell from FY2023 to FY2024 — that topic is mentioned but not fully quantified in the 2025 releases cited [9].
7. Bottom line for readers seeking “current 2025” statistics
For month-by-month enforcement counts (USBP apprehensions, OFO inadmissibles, expulsions) rely on CBP’s Stats and Summaries and its monthly media releases (examples: February 8,347; March 7,181; June nationwide apprehensions ~8,024–8,039; June total encounters ~25,243) [1] [2] [3] [4]. For legal port-level inbound traffic (vehicles, pedestrians, trucks), consult BTS border crossing data and the BTS monthly/annual releases [5] [6]. Analysts should treat CBP/DHS characterizations of causality as agency conclusions and weigh them alongside independent reporting that cites additional factors such as international cooperation and prior policy shifts [10] [9].