Which U.S. citizens were killed by drone strikes during the Obama administration?
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
The Obama administration carried out targeted strikes that killed at least one U.S. citizen — Anwar al‑Awlaki — and struck again days later in Yemen that killed his 16‑year‑old son Abdulrahman, also a U.S. citizen [1] [2]. Attorney General Eric Holder later told Congress that U.S. drone strikes had killed four Americans since 2009, and that three of those were “not specifically targeted” [3].
1. A stark tally: who the sources name
Reporting and scholarship single out Anwar al‑Awlaki as the principal U.S. citizen the Obama administration deliberately targeted and killed by a CIA drone strike; legal analysis of that killing is the subject of extended academic treatment [1]. Separate reporting and reference material identify Abdulrahman al‑Awlaki — Anwar’s 16‑year‑old son and also a U.S. citizen — as being killed by a U.S. drone strike in Yemen days after his father’s death [2]. Those two names dominate official and journalistic accounts in the supplied sources [1] [2].
2. Attorney General Holder’s congressional admission and its implications
In 2016 then‑Attorney General Eric Holder told Congress that U.S. drone strikes since 2009 had killed four Americans abroad; he added that three of those four were “not specifically targeted,” an admission that significantly complicates the narrative about deliberate targeting of citizens [3]. Holder’s statement implies a distinction between authorized, intentional targeting and strikes that nonetheless resulted in American deaths without the individual being a named target [3].
3. Conflicting frames: targeted killing vs. collateral deaths
The Obama White House argued it used narrow legal criteria to authorize lethal force against U.S. citizens alleged to be senior operational leaders of al‑Qaida or associated forces, but critics and independent analysts contested both the legal reasoning and how “near certainty” of avoiding civilian harm was applied [1] [4]. Human rights groups and investigative outlets documented civilian casualties and questioned the counting methods that the administration used, which sometimes treated military‑age males in a strike zone as combatants absent exculpatory intelligence [4] [5].
4. The Abdulrahman case as flashpoint
Abdulrahman al‑Awlaki’s death became a focal point for critics who argued the administration killed an American teenager in a country where the U.S. was not formally at war; human‑rights advocates demanded greater transparency about who is targeted and why [2]. Media coverage noted that the U.S. government said Abdulrahman was in the wrong place at the wrong time, while civil liberties groups contested the lack of public explanation [2] [6].
5. Broader counts and the problem of opacity
Independent trackers estimate hundreds to thousands of civilians killed in the broader drone campaigns in Pakistan, Yemen and Somalia during the Obama years; The Bureau of Investigative Journalism logged hundreds of strikes and put civilian fatalities in the hundreds [7]. The supplied sources underscore that poor transparency — and contested methods for counting civilian deaths — make it difficult to produce a definitive roster of all American citizens who may have died in strikes beyond the high‑profile al‑Awlaki cases [7] [4].
6. Multiple viewpoints and legal debate
Legal scholars who examined Anwar al‑Awlaki’s killing conclude the administration’s legal justification has defensible elements but is also “seriously defective” in reasoning; advocates and some journalists portray the program as overbroad and insufficiently constrained [1] [8]. Congressional hearings and commentary treated drone deaths of Americans as both a counterterrorism necessity and a constitutional problem, reflecting a deep divide in how sources frame executive power and due process [9] [3].
7. What the available sources do not settle
Available sources do not provide a complete list naming all four Americans referenced by Holder, nor do they fully identify the three he said were “not specifically targeted” within the set of supplied documents [3]. They also do not settle contested casualty counts across theaters because investigative groups and official accounts use different methodologies [7] [4].
8. Bottom line for readers
From the documents provided, two U.S. citizens killed in drone strikes during the Obama administration are clearly identified in reporting and academic work: Anwar al‑Awlaki (a deliberate, legally controversial targeting) and his son Abdulrahman (a subsequent strike that drew outcry) [1] [2]. Holder’s congressional statement expands the picture by asserting four American deaths from strikes since 2009, but the supplied sources leave unanswered which additional individuals he referenced and whether those others were intended targets or collateral victims [3].