The United States is actually a religious country, and its Constitution is just a modern interpretation of the Bible.
This fact-check may be outdated. Consider refreshing it to get the most current information.
Executive summary
The United States cannot be accurately described as "actually a religious country" in the sense that its Constitution is merely a modern restatement of the Bible; the Constitution is a secular legal charter that deliberately omits explicit biblical law while emerging in a culture steeped in biblical language and assumptions [1] [2]. Scholarship and advocacy both confirm that the Bible was an important influence among many—English common law, Enlightenment political theory, and colonial practices all shaped the constitutional project alongside biblical ideas [2] [3].
1. The document itself: secular text with a few religious-era trappings
The Constitution largely refrains from religious language—apart from the dating formula “in the Year of our Lord” on the signatures page, it contains no citation of God or Scripture—making it a legal, secular framework rather than a religious code or explicit biblical interpretation [1]. Legal historians emphasize that the text’s structure (separation of powers, checks and balances, federalism) reflects political theory and legal traditions, not direct scriptural commands [2] [4].
2. Cultural context: a biblically literate founding generation
Founders lived in a culture where the King James Bible was ubiquitous and biblical references dominated public discourse; studies find the Bible was frequently cited in founding-era writings and ministers played prominent public roles, so biblical themes naturally permeated political argument and rhetoric [5] [3]. Scholars like Daniel Dreisbach and others argue that a biblical anthropology—such as awareness of human fallibility—informed design choices like checks on power, but they stop short of saying the Constitution is a direct scriptural rewriting [2] [4].
3. Multiple intellectual currents, not a single origin
Scholarly consensus presented in the sources stresses plural origins: English common law, British constitutionalism, various Enlightenment ideas, republican experiments, and biblical tradition all converged in the founders’ thinking [2] [3]. Authors who emphasize biblical influence typically acknowledge it is one thread among many, and that many constitutional principles have antecedents outside Scripture [2] [6].
4. How claims that the Constitution is “just a modern interpretation of the Bible” are promoted
Advocacy organizations and opinion writers sometimes frame the Constitution as fundamentally biblical to support civic or religious agendas; groups like the National Center for Constitutional Studies and WallBuilders draw direct parallels between biblical passages and constitutional provisions and urge a biblical reading of civic life [7] [8]. These actors have clear missions—educating citizens in a “Biblical, historical, and constitutional perspective”—which explains why they foreground biblical parallels [8].
5. Where interpretation is contestable and why it matters
It is difficult to prove that any single constitutional clause was copied from a specific scripture; most historians argue influence is indirect—biblical concepts filtered through English law and colonial habit rather than literal transplantations into the federal charter [6] [9]. Recognizing biblical influence enhances historical understanding of assumptions about human nature and law, but conflating influence with identity risks erasing the Constitution’s deliberate secular mechanisms to accommodate diverse faiths and none [1] [4].
6. Bottom line: influence, not equivalence
The strongest, evidence-based conclusion is that the Bible significantly influenced American political culture and some framers’ thought, but the Constitution is neither a religious constitution nor a straightforward modern interpretation of the Bible; it is a pluralistic legal document shaped by multiple intellectual currents with biblical themes among them [5] [2] [3]. Claims that the U.S. is “actually a religious country” depend on definitions of “religious” and on selective reading of founders’ sources and contemporary advocacy; the constitutional record itself points to a secular charter drafted with an awareness of biblical ideas, not as their paraphrase [1] [6].