Keep Factually independent

Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.

Loading...Time left: ...
Loading...Goal: $500

Fact check: Are US embassies in the middle east being evacuated

Checked on June 12, 2025

1. Summary of the results

The US is indeed conducting partial evacuations of embassy personnel across multiple Middle Eastern locations, but this is not a complete withdrawal of diplomatic presence. Specifically:

  • Non-emergency personnel are being evacuated from Iraq [1]
  • Staff and dependents are being moved from embassies in Kuwait and Bahrain [2]
  • The evacuation extends to UAE facilities [3]
  • The US Embassy in Beirut remains open and operating normally, despite regional security alerts [4]

2. Missing context/alternative viewpoints

Several crucial contextual elements are missing from the original question:

  • The evacuations are specifically targeting non-essential personnel and their families, not all embassy staff [5]
  • The moves are described as precautionary measures rather than immediate responses to direct threats [3]
  • The context behind these evacuations includes:
  • Heightened regional tensions [1]
  • Potential Israeli preparations for an attack on Iran [3]
  • Concerns about possible Iranian retaliation against US sites [1]
  • Some US diplomatic construction projects, such as in Beirut, are continuing despite regional tensions [6]

3. Potential misinformation/bias in the original statement

The original question's broad phrasing could lead to several misconceptions:

  • It suggests an all-or-nothing situation, when in reality the evacuations are selective and vary by location
  • It fails to distinguish between complete evacuation and ordered departure of non-essential personnel
  • The term "evacuation" might suggest a more urgent or comprehensive withdrawal than what's actually occurring

Those who might benefit from various interpretations:

  • Hawks and defense contractors might benefit from emphasizing the urgency and scope of evacuations to justify increased military presence
  • Regional actors might benefit from either downplaying or exaggerating the evacuations to influence diplomatic negotiations
  • Media outlets might benefit from dramatic "full evacuation" headlines, when the reality is more nuanced
Want to dive deeper?
What are the current security threats to US diplomatic missions in the Middle East?
How does the US State Department decide when to evacuate embassy personnel?
Which Middle Eastern countries currently have reduced US diplomatic presence?
What is the difference between embassy evacuation and embassy closure?
How do regional conflicts in the Middle East affect US diplomatic operations?