Keep Factually independent
Whether you agree or disagree with our analysis, these conversations matter for democracy. We don't take money from political groups - even a $5 donation helps us keep it that way.
How does the US rank in global freedom indices compared to other countries?
Executive summary
The United States ranks in the upper-middle tier on broad, multi-dimensional freedom measures but performs unevenly across different indices: it is tied 17th on the Human Freedom Index (out of ~165 jurisdictions) yet shows weaker results on specialized measures such as academic freedom (ranked #85 on the 2025 Academic Freedom Index) and mixed scores on press and economic freedom depending on the index (press: the US scores comparatively high in some datasets) [1] [2] [3]. Available sources show substantial variation across indices because each measures different freedoms and uses different methodologies [4].
1. A patchwork of rankings — why “freedom” isn’t one number
Freedom indices measure different things: the Human Freedom Index blends personal and economic freedoms across 86 indicators; Freedom House focuses on political rights and civil liberties; RSF measures press freedom specifically; the Academic Freedom Index focuses on higher education autonomy — so the US can rank well on one (HFI tie at 17) and poorly on another (AFI #85) without contradiction [1] [2] [5] [4].
2. Where the United States stands on comprehensive measures
The Human Freedom Index — a broad composite co-published by the Cato Institute and others — places the United States tied for 17th among roughly 165 jurisdictions, indicating the US sits in the upper tier globally on combined personal and economic freedoms [1]. The Atlantic Council’s Freedom and Prosperity Indexes and atlas also provide country-level freedom scores and rank the US among developed democracies, though they emphasize trends and subindexes that can show relative decline or stability over time [6] [7].
3. Press freedom: relatively strong but under pressure globally
Reporters Without Borders’ World Press Freedom Index shows a global deterioration in press conditions in 2025, with economic fragility highlighted as a leading threat; RSF’s published rankings place countries like Norway and Estonia at the top, and RSF’s materials indicate press freedom is under stress worldwide — the US appears comparatively better than many but is not immune to the economic and political pressures RSF documents [8] [9]. WorldPopulationReview reporting indicates the US scores well on press freedom relative to some peers, but that is one slice of the broader picture [3].
4. Economic freedom and specialized indices diverge
Indices that focus on economic freedom — such as the Heritage Foundation’s Index of Economic Freedom and the economic subindexes inside multi-index projects — can rank the US differently than political/civil measures because they assess regulations, property rights, trade openness and fiscal policy [10]. Broad indexes that combine economic and personal freedoms produce different placements than single-issue indices; the HFI’s methodology explicitly merges personal and economic dimensions to produce its overall rank [1] [11].
5. Academic freedom: a notable underperformance in 2025
The 2025 Academic Freedom Index singled out the United States for a sharp decline, ranking it #85 and noting sustained year-over-year deterioration tied to state and federal policy changes affecting higher education autonomy [2]. This specialized assessment highlights how a leading liberal-democratic country can see serious setbacks in one domain even while remaining comparatively free on other measures [2].
6. Regional context: Western democracies generally score higher
Multiple datasets cited — including the Human Freedom Index and regional analyses — place North America and Western Europe among the highest-scoring regions for freedom, while regions like the Middle East, Africa and South Asia tend to score lower; that context helps explain why the US ranks with other Western democracies rather than with lower-scoring regions [11] [1].
7. Methodology matters — read the fine print
Indices differ in coverage (number of countries), indicators, weighting and whether they prioritize legal protections, lived experience, or institutional performance; Wikipedia’s list of freedom indices underlines the variety of measures and the caution needed when comparing rankings directly [4]. The Human Freedom Index uses dozens of indicators to generate a single “human freedom” value; RSF focuses on journalism-related variables; AFI uses academic-specific indicators — these choices shape outcomes [1] [5] [2].
8. Competing narratives and implicit agendas
Index producers have missions that shape emphasis: the Cato/Fraser-run HFI emphasizes negative liberty and economic elements; Heritage’s Index ties economic freedom to prosperity; RSF centers journalists’ working conditions; the Freedom Index from advocacy groups can reflect partisan goals — readers should note each source’s viewpoint when interpreting rankings [1] [10] [9] [12]. Wikipedia’s coverage also flags critiques about bias and conceptual stretching in some widely used indices [13].
9. Bottom line for readers asking “how free is the US?”
The United States ranks among the world’s more free countries on broad composite indices (HFI tied 17th) but exhibits important weaknesses on narrower measures like academic freedom (rank 85) and faces the same press-economic pressures flagged globally by RSF [1] [2] [8]. Which ranking matters most depends on whether you care about political/civil rights, economic regulations, press conditions or academic autonomy — each index tells a different, evidence-backed part of the story [4].
Limitations: This overview summarizes the available sources provided and does not attempt to harmonize methodological differences beyond noting them; specific numeric ranks for some indices (e.g., the complete list from Heritage or Freedom House) are available in the referenced sites but are not exhaustively reproduced here [10] [14].